

you can't see it in the top one, but there were more bands of color under the rainbow. Can anyone tell me what they were? I brought them out as much as I could in this one, but there were more of them, and they appeared to be in a more light-dark-light-dark pattern. edit: oooh cool. I think it was more than one reflected rainbow.



but why could I see them?
( ,
Sun 9 Nov 2003, 23:56,
archived)

A fainter one under the more visible one. Or so I believe, I forget who told me.
A lot nicer than two speculums though.
( ,
Sun 9 Nov 2003, 23:56,
archived)
A lot nicer than two speculums though.

Now here's a word you don't hear enough at the dinner table.
( ,
Mon 10 Nov 2003, 0:00,
archived)

i've gone and got a job and a girlie and loads of my old friends are making excessive demands on my time and liver.
Life is good.
How's life in the lands of Womble-Kitten?
( ,
Mon 10 Nov 2003, 0:04,
archived)
Life is good.
How's life in the lands of Womble-Kitten?

that sounds nice.
All is well here. Are you doing the Manc bash?
( ,
Mon 10 Nov 2003, 0:10,
archived)
All is well here. Are you doing the Manc bash?

*scampers off to 4rthur...*
EDIT: It's very tempting indeedy... I actually have a free weekend although spondies are running low. I'll see what happens about shifts next weekend and then decide around tuesday. You going?
( ,
Mon 10 Nov 2003, 0:12,
archived)
EDIT: It's very tempting indeedy... I actually have a free weekend although spondies are running low. I'll see what happens about shifts next weekend and then decide around tuesday. You going?

I'd see how the spondies were running about Tuesday and then decide. :)
( ,
Mon 10 Nov 2003, 0:16,
archived)

I shall make sure i'm on in the week, say tuesday?
Same b3ta-time, same b3ta-channel.
Peace. Love.
( ,
Mon 10 Nov 2003, 0:19,
archived)
Same b3ta-time, same b3ta-channel.
Peace. Love.

But yes, we must synchonise watches and shite like that.
( ,
Mon 10 Nov 2003, 0:25,
archived)

sometimes you get a double rainbow, wher eit start to repeat, but much paler. i think it's that.
( ,
Sun 9 Nov 2003, 23:56,
archived)

I don't know if I can explain it.
Alternating bands of light and dark greater in width than the width of the colored part of the rainbow and decreasing in intensity.
( ,
Mon 10 Nov 2003, 0:00,
archived)
Alternating bands of light and dark greater in width than the width of the colored part of the rainbow and decreasing in intensity.

a reverse rainbow, i saw a thing about them on open university at 3am one morning, under each rainbow is another one, with the colours reversed, for some reason........
( ,
Sun 9 Nov 2003, 23:57,
archived)

Rainbows are produced when sunlight is reflected and refracted by raindrops in a manner similar to the refraction occurring when light passes through a prism. The light rays making up the main, or primary, rainbow experience single internal reflection from the back surfaces of the drops. The light composing the secondary bow undergoes two reflections from the raindrops. As you know from looking in a mirror, the action of reflection is to cause an inversion of an image. Your right hand appears to be your left hand. The second reflection in a raindrop reverses the order of the colors in the rainbow. In rare cases, you can see a very weak third bow. It is explained by three reflections and exhibits the same order of colors as does the primary bow. At each reflection, only part of the incident light is actually reflected, therefore, the more the reflections, the less bright the bow.
( ,
Sun 9 Nov 2003, 23:58,
archived)

No I don't.
I used to but it looks like Micro$oft are going to buy it at some point. Can't complain, I did apply for a job with them after all...
( ,
Mon 10 Nov 2003, 0:08,
archived)
I used to but it looks like Micro$oft are going to buy it at some point. Can't complain, I did apply for a job with them after all...

No idea if that changes the amount of truth in the story though.
( ,
Mon 10 Nov 2003, 0:14,
archived)