
i think the ball was a lil hedgehog in that movie.
( ,
Tue 6 Jan 2004, 4:15,
archived)

I tried to watch that Disney one on tv for the first time, and unfortunately, my expectations were too high.
I'm far too used to the books and Tenniel's engravings.
( ,
Tue 6 Jan 2004, 4:16,
archived)
I'm far too used to the books and Tenniel's engravings.

insists on showing it to his kids
I don't agree with the whole thing so I buy them porn
/slightly untrue
( ,
Tue 6 Jan 2004, 4:19,
archived)
I don't agree with the whole thing so I buy them porn
/slightly untrue

can't anyone enjoy watching movies anymore without comparing them to the book. ;)
/guilty
really the book is great. but the child in me loves the movie too.
*edit* - hell, the adult in me loves it too. it's just beautiful.
( ,
Tue 6 Jan 2004, 4:20,
archived)
/guilty
really the book is great. but the child in me loves the movie too.
*edit* - hell, the adult in me loves it too. it's just beautiful.

is it some sort of psychic genius leader like Quato in Total Recall?
( ,
Tue 6 Jan 2004, 4:22,
archived)

demanding i play 'My Little Pony'.
( ,
Tue 6 Jan 2004, 4:25,
archived)

rainbows on their butts, and smell of plastic....the more the merrier i say.
( ,
Tue 6 Jan 2004, 4:28,
archived)

i hate disney for fucking pooh right up the arse and ruining everything.
ever.
( ,
Tue 6 Jan 2004, 4:23,
archived)
ever.

Didn't Roy stroppily resign the other week saying Eisner was shite? I seem to recall he resigned to encourage them to hire him in the first place
/babbling

www.savedisney.com
Ole roy is now starting that there campaign to get Eisner out, saying how he's turned it into a souless company and stuff.
( ,
Tue 6 Jan 2004, 4:44,
archived)
Ole roy is now starting that there campaign to get Eisner out, saying how he's turned it into a souless company and stuff.

I knew some conservative people at uni who wouldn't have anything to do with Disney stuff because they were gay-friendly
( ,
Tue 6 Jan 2004, 4:30,
archived)

I see where you're going with that.
nyucknyucknyucknyucknyuck.
( ,
Tue 6 Jan 2004, 4:29,
archived)
nyucknyucknyucknyucknyuck.

but I can..
like, I never read beyond Fellowship in LOTR, and just saw Towers on dvd recently, which was sweeet.
I do tend to prefer films that are original screenplays, but Adaptation has to be a superlative exception.
woo Spike.
( ,
Tue 6 Jan 2004, 4:23,
archived)
like, I never read beyond Fellowship in LOTR, and just saw Towers on dvd recently, which was sweeet.
I do tend to prefer films that are original screenplays, but Adaptation has to be a superlative exception.
woo Spike.

but I was in a fucking terrible mood
the films and the book of lord of the rings are really different things - the films are Peter Jackson's and the Books are Tolkein's. Tolkein can't write dialogue for shit and the pace is all wrong - yet it works because he's a genious. Jackson (and Walsch and Pippa whats her face)can write dialogue and his direction is genious.
/over explaining the bloody obvious
( ,
Tue 6 Jan 2004, 4:27,
archived)
the films and the book of lord of the rings are really different things - the films are Peter Jackson's and the Books are Tolkein's. Tolkein can't write dialogue for shit and the pace is all wrong - yet it works because he's a genious. Jackson (and Walsch and Pippa whats her face)can write dialogue and his direction is genious.
/over explaining the bloody obvious

but it's far more likely it was the closing of my tags
( ,
Tue 6 Jan 2004, 4:30,
archived)

they're different forms, but the story is the same, even if some of the details are left out.
( ,
Tue 6 Jan 2004, 4:31,
archived)