I'd repost one of mine, but I can't decide which :)
(,
Tue 6 Jan 2004, 4:12,
archived)
i think the ball was a lil hedgehog in that movie.
(,
Tue 6 Jan 2004, 4:15,
archived)
I tried to watch that Disney one on tv for the first time, and unfortunately, my expectations were too high.
I'm far too used to the books and Tenniel's engravings.
(,
Tue 6 Jan 2004, 4:16,
archived)
I'm far too used to the books and Tenniel's engravings.
insists on showing it to his kids
I don't agree with the whole thing so I buy them porn
/slightly untrue
(,
Tue 6 Jan 2004, 4:19,
archived)
I don't agree with the whole thing so I buy them porn
/slightly untrue
can't anyone enjoy watching movies anymore without comparing them to the book. ;)
/guilty
really the book is great. but the child in me loves the movie too.
*edit* - hell, the adult in me loves it too. it's just beautiful.
(,
Tue 6 Jan 2004, 4:20,
archived)
/guilty
really the book is great. but the child in me loves the movie too.
*edit* - hell, the adult in me loves it too. it's just beautiful.
is it some sort of psychic genius leader like Quato in Total Recall?
(,
Tue 6 Jan 2004, 4:22,
archived)
demanding i play 'My Little Pony'.
(,
Tue 6 Jan 2004, 4:25,
archived)
rainbows on their butts, and smell of plastic....the more the merrier i say.
(,
Tue 6 Jan 2004, 4:28,
archived)
i hate disney for fucking pooh right up the arse and ruining everything.
ever.
(,
Tue 6 Jan 2004, 4:23,
archived)
ever.
Didn't Roy stroppily resign the other week saying Eisner was shite? I seem to recall he resigned to encourage them to hire him in the first place
/babbling
www.savedisney.com
Ole roy is now starting that there campaign to get Eisner out, saying how he's turned it into a souless company and stuff.
(,
Tue 6 Jan 2004, 4:44,
archived)
Ole roy is now starting that there campaign to get Eisner out, saying how he's turned it into a souless company and stuff.
I knew some conservative people at uni who wouldn't have anything to do with Disney stuff because they were gay-friendly
(,
Tue 6 Jan 2004, 4:30,
archived)
I see where you're going with that.
nyucknyucknyucknyucknyuck.
(,
Tue 6 Jan 2004, 4:29,
archived)
nyucknyucknyucknyucknyuck.
but I can..
like, I never read beyond Fellowship in LOTR, and just saw Towers on dvd recently, which was sweeet.
I do tend to prefer films that are original screenplays, but Adaptation has to be a superlative exception.
woo Spike.
(,
Tue 6 Jan 2004, 4:23,
archived)
like, I never read beyond Fellowship in LOTR, and just saw Towers on dvd recently, which was sweeet.
I do tend to prefer films that are original screenplays, but Adaptation has to be a superlative exception.
woo Spike.
but I was in a fucking terrible mood
the films and the book of lord of the rings are really different things - the films are Peter Jackson's and the Books are Tolkein's. Tolkein can't write dialogue for shit and the pace is all wrong - yet it works because he's a genious. Jackson (and Walsch and Pippa whats her face)can write dialogue and his direction is genious.
/over explaining the bloody obvious
(,
Tue 6 Jan 2004, 4:27,
archived)
the films and the book of lord of the rings are really different things - the films are Peter Jackson's and the Books are Tolkein's. Tolkein can't write dialogue for shit and the pace is all wrong - yet it works because he's a genious. Jackson (and Walsch and Pippa whats her face)can write dialogue and his direction is genious.
/over explaining the bloody obvious
but it's far more likely it was the closing of my tags
(,
Tue 6 Jan 2004, 4:30,
archived)
they're different forms, but the story is the same, even if some of the details are left out.
(,
Tue 6 Jan 2004, 4:31,
archived)
was the "deconstructionist" joke.
At which I laughed far, far too much.
(,
Tue 6 Jan 2004, 4:28,
archived)
At which I laughed far, far too much.
i was just whining.
and trying to make a general point.
(,
Tue 6 Jan 2004, 4:44,
archived)
and trying to make a general point.


