TJ: ::techfeed:: - what do you think?
(,
Tue 6 Jan 2004, 15:44,
archived)
"this is a website i am doing as part of a final project at university. any feedback on the design or navigation of the website would be appreciated"
(,
Tue 6 Jan 2004, 15:48,
archived)
i've always found "that" one quite amaturish and hard to read
(as for what it does/is, it does a good job)
(,
Tue 6 Jan 2004, 15:50,
archived)
(as for what it does/is, it does a good job)
looking again, it's probably just that font (verdana, is it?) in bold that annoys me
(,
Tue 6 Jan 2004, 15:51,
archived)
what font do you think would look better? (anything but times new roman)
(,
Tue 6 Jan 2004, 15:52,
archived)
i know css gives you a lot of options for boldness, but if i remember correctly, only "not bold" and "bold" have any really difference
(,
Tue 6 Jan 2004, 15:53,
archived)
were in the php and not the css.
not bad considering i didn't know sql/php last week
(,
Tue 6 Jan 2004, 15:59,
archived)
not bad considering i didn't know sql/php last week
so far I've had to content myself with an artist's impression:

(,
Tue 6 Jan 2004, 15:56,
archived)

Sadly, due to a medical condition* I was unable to spazz, and was therefore unaware of band wagonage. Damn.
*Congenital laziness.
(,
Tue 6 Jan 2004, 15:49,
archived)
*Congenital laziness.
as long as the images are good and the idea original. as that was. what is annoying is someone pasting snoopy on to the mars surface, as a 500K bitmap
(,
Tue 6 Jan 2004, 15:51,
archived)
I'm not a fan of band wagons m'sen, but seeing as I barely post owt, I've no grounds for complaint.
On the great font debate, I have little to add other than this: georgia has been wanked over today by our web design types. Take that as you will. Site looks nice, otherwise.
(,
Tue 6 Jan 2004, 15:57,
archived)
On the great font debate, I have little to add other than this: georgia has been wanked over today by our web design types. Take that as you will. Site looks nice, otherwise.