
you'd have done better to post your new one with links to the two from last night
reposting in new threads isn't recommended
( ,
Thu 22 Jan 2004, 10:31,
archived)
reposting in new threads isn't recommended

*adopts monty python voice* just dont do it again.
( ,
Thu 22 Jan 2004, 10:32,
archived)

but in an authoritarian fashion...
personaly i think they're ace
( ,
Thu 22 Jan 2004, 10:33,
archived)
personaly i think they're ace

remember that people may well be on here a lot.
So if they see the same thing again they feel a little misled.
( ,
Thu 22 Jan 2004, 10:39,
archived)
So if they see the same thing again they feel a little misled.

some peiople spazz a whole days posts... can't say i bother
( ,
Thu 22 Jan 2004, 10:40,
archived)

Many dayshifters "do the spazz" when they get in.
I for one gan all the way back to whatever time I left work. Takes me about an hour. Most productive hour of my day.
( ,
Thu 22 Jan 2004, 10:41,
archived)
I for one gan all the way back to whatever time I left work. Takes me about an hour. Most productive hour of my day.

incase the miss a picture of a kitten or something.
But in reality, it has the same effect as what is known as a "threadwaste". Also some people who live here (ie, me) get to see the same thing over-and-over again.
Basicly, it depends on the context, but if you reply with that picture in a relevent post, you would be bound to get a few 'Woo' and 'Yay's
Since when has being helpfull replaced 'Cock Off' ? It's alot easyer to just type that =P
( ,
Thu 22 Jan 2004, 10:46,
archived)
But in reality, it has the same effect as what is known as a "threadwaste". Also some people who live here (ie, me) get to see the same thing over-and-over again.
Basicly, it depends on the context, but if you reply with that picture in a relevent post, you would be bound to get a few 'Woo' and 'Yay's
Since when has being helpfull replaced 'Cock Off' ? It's alot easyer to just type that =P