b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » Message 2994287

# Cats in the Matrix...

(, Sun 4 Apr 2004, 10:28, archived)
# i got that film
i liked it not as action packed as the second but i though it was good how it all came full circle, and back to as the film ebgan (well before the film began etc etc
(, Sun 4 Apr 2004, 10:29, archived)
# the middle bit with all the shooting was boring
it took what seemed like half an hour when it could have easily taken up 7-10 minuted
(, Sun 4 Apr 2004, 10:35, archived)
# true
...and the first 30-40 mins of the second film could have been left out.
(, Sun 4 Apr 2004, 10:37, archived)
# And replaced with techno dancing
(, Sun 4 Apr 2004, 10:38, archived)
# No...
...no...no...no...
(, Sun 4 Apr 2004, 10:39, archived)
# the last two films could easily have just been one
(, Sun 4 Apr 2004, 10:39, archived)
# aint that the truth
but that would have cost US £15 less.



and that just wont do.

edit:
and i also have another 3 hours of behind the scenes crapola than i had before- huzzah!
(actually i like looking at that stuff)

i have the animatrix too, i like them.
(, Sun 4 Apr 2004, 10:41, archived)
# saw the animatrix on
telly, damn good
(, Sun 4 Apr 2004, 10:56, archived)
# animatrix
what all 9 of them?

its only £6.99 at play.com now
thats why i gotted it.

i like the hand drawn ones more.
(, Sun 4 Apr 2004, 10:58, archived)
# i need to get revolutions, cant really afford it
i have the first 2 and the animatrix and enter the matrix and the soundtack CDs
(, Sun 4 Apr 2004, 10:58, archived)
# not blatently promoting play.com but
£14.99 at play.com
(, Sun 4 Apr 2004, 11:00, archived)
# Cats 'n' stuff
As a newbie, I can't help wondering whats with all the cats???

Why not pigs?
(, Sun 4 Apr 2004, 10:51, archived)
# well
been to rathergood.com

i think you'll find your answer there
(, Sun 4 Apr 2004, 10:53, archived)
# Because of
(, Sun 4 Apr 2004, 10:58, archived)
# And
(, Sun 4 Apr 2004, 11:12, archived)
# personally...
...I don't like cats, because they're not that fluffy
(, Sun 4 Apr 2004, 11:01, archived)