i have a question?
did kill bill 1 not appear in the oscars because its part of a 2-part film - or just because the academy didn't like it?
(,
Wed 21 Apr 2004, 11:04,
archived)
did kill bill 1 not appear in the oscars because its part of a 2-part film - or just because the academy didn't like it?
as would his mother*
* she may not disagree, I don't know
(,
Wed 21 Apr 2004, 11:06,
archived)
* she may not disagree, I don't know
Reservior Dogs and Pulp Fiction are classic films. Even his least well recieved offering, Jackie Brown, is an excellent, superior crime film. He's a great writer and an excellent director.
(,
Wed 21 Apr 2004, 11:12,
archived)
Does not a great director make... or sommat.
No jam no spoon.
No mouth no trousers*
*99% Fact
(,
Wed 21 Apr 2004, 11:16,
archived)
No jam no spoon.
No mouth no trousers*
*99% Fact
If Jackie Brown is his worst film, that's a staggering body of work.
(,
Wed 21 Apr 2004, 11:17,
archived)
have been fooled by marketing and men's magazines.
(,
Wed 21 Apr 2004, 11:20,
archived)
because they're at least 20% machisimo male posturing bollocks
(,
Wed 21 Apr 2004, 11:13,
archived)
Yes, very prominent in Kill Bill, I noticed.
/rolls eyes
and they didn't have any ID to get in
(,
Wed 21 Apr 2004, 11:07,
archived)
But also it's not really an "Oscar" film, if you know what I mean. I could imagine it picking up technical awards and such. It'll be like when Return Of The King won everything for LOTR.
(,
Wed 21 Apr 2004, 11:09,
archived)
was once caught threadwasting ... the Academy have shunned him ever since ...
*100% bollocks*
(,
Wed 21 Apr 2004, 11:10,
archived)
*100% bollocks*