b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » XXX » Message 3072924 (Thread)

# good morning
i have a question?

did kill bill 1 not appear in the oscars because its part of a 2-part film - or just because the academy didn't like it?
(, Wed 21 Apr 2004, 11:04, archived)
# It's because Quentin Tarantino is shit.
100% of FACT.
(, Wed 21 Apr 2004, 11:05, archived)
# he would disagree
as would his mother*


* she may not disagree, I don't know
(, Wed 21 Apr 2004, 11:06, archived)
# yes,
I to fail to see what all the fuss is about
(, Wed 21 Apr 2004, 11:06, archived)
# Wrong, wrong ,wrong
FACT

Seriously though, WRONG
(, Wed 21 Apr 2004, 11:08, archived)
# I am not.
His films are 50% rubbish and 50% hype.
(, Wed 21 Apr 2004, 11:10, archived)
# Really have to disagree
Reservior Dogs and Pulp Fiction are classic films. Even his least well recieved offering, Jackie Brown, is an excellent, superior crime film. He's a great writer and an excellent director.
(, Wed 21 Apr 2004, 11:12, archived)
# Bag of shite.
That's my final word on the subject.
(, Wed 21 Apr 2004, 11:13, archived)
# and a guest judge on american idol
(, Wed 21 Apr 2004, 11:13, archived)
# Two good films
Does not a great director make... or sommat.

No jam no spoon.

No mouth no trousers*

*99% Fact

(, Wed 21 Apr 2004, 11:16, archived)
# no bridge

no shark

no helicopter

need i say more
(, Wed 21 Apr 2004, 11:17, archived)
# How about five?
If Jackie Brown is his worst film, that's a staggering body of work.
(, Wed 21 Apr 2004, 11:17, archived)
# You, my friend,
have been fooled by marketing and men's magazines.
(, Wed 21 Apr 2004, 11:20, archived)
# that can't be right
because they're at least 20% machisimo male posturing bollocks
(, Wed 21 Apr 2004, 11:13, archived)
# "machisimo male posturing bollocks"

Yes, very prominent in Kill Bill, I noticed.

/rolls eyes
(, Wed 21 Apr 2004, 11:14, archived)
# My mistake.
You are absolutely correct.
(, Wed 21 Apr 2004, 11:15, archived)
# nah
they rang me up and I haven't seen it yet
(, Wed 21 Apr 2004, 11:06, archived)
# it's because it was rated 18
and they didn't have any ID to get in
(, Wed 21 Apr 2004, 11:07, archived)
# Pretty much
But also it's not really an "Oscar" film, if you know what I mean. I could imagine it picking up technical awards and such. It'll be like when Return Of The King won everything for LOTR.
(, Wed 21 Apr 2004, 11:09, archived)
# Tarantino
was once caught threadwasting ... the Academy have shunned him ever since ...


*100% bollocks*

(, Wed 21 Apr 2004, 11:10, archived)
# I was under the impression
that it was released too late to be considered by the Academy this time around, but I may be wrong.

Plus I never got around to seeing it. Poo.
(, Wed 21 Apr 2004, 11:13, archived)
# Blockbusters
NOW!
(, Wed 21 Apr 2004, 11:16, archived)
# I would imagine it's because
it's not really all that.. but Tarantino's old stuff is brilliant, Pulp Fiction was great
(, Wed 21 Apr 2004, 11:16, archived)