my combo entry :
now if i only knew or cared about who this person is..
From the Boris Johnson World challenge. See all 433 entries (closed)
( , Thu 30 Sep 2004, 21:34, archived)
now if i only knew or cared about who this person is..
From the Boris Johnson World challenge. See all 433 entries (closed)
( , Thu 30 Sep 2004, 21:34, archived)
Hehehe, woo!
Ps. Anyone understand this? personal.baker.edu/web2/cdavis09/roses.html
Supposedly there's a clue in the name...
( ,
Thu 30 Sep 2004, 21:35,
archived)
Supposedly there's a clue in the name...
give me a list of the correct answers from 10 rolls of the dice
any patterns you see?
( ,
Thu 30 Sep 2004, 21:36,
archived)
yes well withiel has given the game away rather bluntly
but I was going to suggest looking at what features of a dice always occured in even numbers
( ,
Thu 30 Sep 2004, 21:40,
archived)
Ah, oh well
Well yeah, I thought originally that it'd be something to do with a central dot, but couldn't think of how.
Ta.
( ,
Thu 30 Sep 2004, 21:42,
archived)
Ta.
yes
the "rose" is a central dot. The number of petals is the total number of dots that surround a central one.
so, a roll of 3 provides 2 petals, a roll of 5 provides 4 petals, but a roll of 6 gives no petals, etc.
( ,
Thu 30 Sep 2004, 21:39,
archived)
so, a roll of 3 provides 2 petals, a roll of 5 provides 4 petals, but a roll of 6 gives no petals, etc.
I didn't check back here, so it wasn't spoiled for me
clever test. opens the mind.
( ,
Thu 30 Sep 2004, 21:48,
archived)
Yeah
I'm very glad I didn't check back. It's interesting to see the different perspectives on solving it though. The mathematician would imediately look for the pattern in rolls, whereas a more 'arty' person (sorry, not sposed to be offensive) may see the 'rose' in question.
( ,
Thu 30 Sep 2004, 21:52,
archived)
How dare you call B3tans 'Arty'!!!
Not sure I can stand for this...
( ,
Thu 30 Sep 2004, 22:11,
archived)