
to even bother poutting in fake details ¬_¬
( ,
Sun 26 Dec 2004, 22:30,
archived)

the less appealing it appears to be.
( ,
Sun 26 Dec 2004, 22:33,
archived)

but I'm not sure that adding false details actually wastes anyone's time. I don't think spammers look at their returned mail.
( ,
Sun 26 Dec 2004, 22:40,
archived)

and let crawlers pick it up :)
www.headstaggers.com/__mail/
blocked from google/yahoo bots (proper law-abiding bots) but naughty people ignore robot exclusion rules... click spang a couple of times
edit: I`d written a better one in Java that would spit out 1000 random e-mail addresses, one every few seconds, so it wouldn`t eat all the bandwidth / processor
( ,
Sun 26 Dec 2004, 22:44,
archived)
www.headstaggers.com/__mail/
blocked from google/yahoo bots (proper law-abiding bots) but naughty people ignore robot exclusion rules... click spang a couple of times
edit: I`d written a better one in Java that would spit out 1000 random e-mail addresses, one every few seconds, so it wouldn`t eat all the bandwidth / processor