b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » Product Displacement » Message 5463813

[challenge entry]

From the Product Displacement challenge. See all 248 entries (closed)

(, Wed 21 Dec 2005, 23:09, archived)
# why does nobody make wallpaper
for us widescreen users.

*cries*
(, Wed 21 Dec 2005, 23:11, archived)
# coz your richer then us
so you can pay me if you want
(, Wed 21 Dec 2005, 23:11, archived)
# hahahahaha..
(, Wed 21 Dec 2005, 23:12, archived)
# piss
mind
(, Wed 21 Dec 2005, 23:13, archived)
# what size would you like?
( just for future reference as I do wallpapery stuff )

[i'm on 1680x1050 but always have to resize for screenshots for the normals]
(, Wed 21 Dec 2005, 23:12, archived)
# 1440 x 900
kthx.
(, Wed 21 Dec 2005, 23:13, archived)
# I'd like 1440*900 versions for my laptop
please thanking you muchylyness...
ED: piss
(, Wed 21 Dec 2005, 23:14, archived)
# get yer own
resolution mate.
(, Wed 21 Dec 2005, 23:14, archived)
# Boo!
I love my laptop! Much better than this crap home comp Im on
(, Wed 21 Dec 2005, 23:19, archived)
# I shall keep that in mind
when I'm doing 3d wallpaper stuff.
(, Wed 21 Dec 2005, 23:16, archived)
# sweet!
(, Wed 21 Dec 2005, 23:18, archived)
# Sweet dude!
ED: ARG! out of my mind! out of my mind!!
ED2: Dont go out of the way, it's just nice to be a minority!
(, Wed 21 Dec 2005, 23:19, archived)
# Minority you say?
'tain't everyone who has a cute little penguin on their bootup screen :)
(, Wed 21 Dec 2005, 23:26, archived)
# *Ponders if there are Linux ghettos*
(, Wed 21 Dec 2005, 23:33, archived)
# 1280x1024
(, Wed 21 Dec 2005, 23:14, archived)
# Yup
but I crank it up to 1600 for the GIMP
(, Wed 21 Dec 2005, 23:18, archived)
# Its nicely done..but
you assume people here have a tiny monitor.. 1024x768 pfft!

CLICK FOR BIGGIE
(, Wed 21 Dec 2005, 23:11, archived)
# let us unite
to form a band of brothers devoted to obscure screen resolutions.
(, Wed 21 Dec 2005, 23:12, archived)
# Yay..
gather the burning torches!
(, Wed 21 Dec 2005, 23:13, archived)
# 1280 myself
but the majority...
(, Wed 21 Dec 2005, 23:13, archived)
# rah rah i'm rich rah
:P
(, Wed 21 Dec 2005, 23:31, archived)
# Nice, but the bottom reflection's all fucked up.
(, Wed 21 Dec 2005, 23:14, archived)
# how is it?
(, Wed 21 Dec 2005, 23:15, archived)
# I see what he/she/it is saying... the green bit is distorted improperly
(, Wed 21 Dec 2005, 23:17, archived)
# light glare
(, Wed 21 Dec 2005, 23:18, archived)
# no
you have lines rising vertically from the green circle, where there are none in the top bit.
(, Wed 21 Dec 2005, 23:19, archived)
# they are from the sides of the circle
(, Wed 21 Dec 2005, 23:20, archived)
# Would it not be more like this?
(, Wed 21 Dec 2005, 23:24, archived)
# nope
when light reflects it tends to have lines, go play or look at cars at night when the roads wet etc.
(, Wed 21 Dec 2005, 23:26, archived)
# ahh... I see where you are coming from
but you assume a wet or distorted lense, not a glass reflection as your pic would suggest.

EDIT: forget this, just being pedantic I guess, your pic is excellently shopped!.. that is all! :)
(, Wed 21 Dec 2005, 23:27, archived)
# I understand now.
It looks right, but the lines look a little exagerrated.
(, Wed 21 Dec 2005, 23:32, archived)
# arnt everything microsoft produce?
(, Wed 21 Dec 2005, 23:33, archived)
# "arnt everything microsoft produce?"
I'm sorry, what?
(, Wed 21 Dec 2005, 23:35, archived)
# I am not even going to say..
"bad workman blames his tools.."


Oops, too late. ;)
(, Wed 21 Dec 2005, 23:36, archived)
# Hahaha..
(, Wed 21 Dec 2005, 23:35, archived)
# Nicely shopped!
(, Wed 21 Dec 2005, 23:21, archived)
# tah
(, Wed 21 Dec 2005, 23:26, archived)