b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » Message 5665430 (Thread)

# follow the smoke
because it's on fucking fire already.
(, Thu 16 Feb 2006, 9:54, archived)
# IT'S ON FUC.....

best not eh,



(, Thu 16 Feb 2006, 9:55, archived)
# Hurrah !
Watch out there's a mod about.
(, Thu 16 Feb 2006, 9:56, archived)
# at least he (she?)'s deleting Monitor killers!
...
(, Thu 16 Feb 2006, 9:59, archived)
# i spose i better do some work now.....
well, after my 10min break of course
*wanders off*
(, Thu 16 Feb 2006, 10:01, archived)
# I suspect a she.
Sensitive about the C-word.
Didn't even linky it.
(, Thu 16 Feb 2006, 10:02, archived)
# Well the competition was to create the most offensive thing in under 5k.
Not only was the word offensive, so was the optimization and the size. Surely I won the competition if I had my thread deleted due to it's ofensiveness?
(, Thu 16 Feb 2006, 10:04, archived)
# Good point, well made
(, Thu 16 Feb 2006, 10:06, archived)
# ^This^
(and boo to censorship !)
(, Thu 16 Feb 2006, 10:11, archived)
# It's OK, I don't care
it was a stupid post anyway. Hardly my finest moment!
(, Thu 16 Feb 2006, 10:18, archived)
# I just think
the actions of the Mods over the last few days have caused a fluffiness reduction.
And why have an offensive compo if you're going to remove entries ?
Especially if you aren't going to explain why you've done it !
Bah !
(, Thu 16 Feb 2006, 10:22, archived)
# i think the fact that it was a 3000px wide, browser-fuck of an image, might have had something to do with it.
:D
(, Thu 16 Feb 2006, 10:25, archived)
# what happened?
(, Thu 16 Feb 2006, 10:04, archived)
# A cunt got wiped
(sorry!)
(, Thu 16 Feb 2006, 10:05, archived)
#
(, Thu 16 Feb 2006, 10:06, archived)
# I dun a 3,000 pixel wide rude word
for the compo. It was less than 1k though!
(, Thu 16 Feb 2006, 10:06, archived)
# Oh
Blessed with that knowledge, I can safely go to work. Tara.
(, Thu 16 Feb 2006, 10:07, archived)
# Obviously
you lost points for using text.
(, Thu 16 Feb 2006, 10:19, archived)
# Shite!
That was totally why it was deleted! I assumed it was typed text they were referring to, but I guess text within the image is cheating too.
(, Thu 16 Feb 2006, 10:23, archived)
# It's probably because it was 3000 pixels wide.
That's not offensive, it's just bloody annoying.
(, Thu 16 Feb 2006, 10:26, archived)