Thought id have a go and tucking away from the mods myself
Beastmeter Small But Scrappy,
Fri 11 Aug 2006, 22:37,
archived)
Nice :-)It all seems to be pissing off the mods at any rate.
"People can look at the picture and make up their own minds. Why the obsession with whether he looks like Ian Huntley or not?"
("People can look at the picture and make up their own minds. Why the obsession with whether he looks like Ian Huntley or not?"
The Glum Reaper cannot solve your problem because he has no jam,
Fri 11 Aug 2006, 22:39,
archived)
right, this is what we do....we make the word girl (in lost teeth in fight over girl) to a link pointing to maxine carrs profile, that might be obscure enough
( Beastmeter Small But Scrappy,
Fri 11 Aug 2006, 22:42,
archived)
Cunning.I like it!
( The Glum Reaper cannot solve your problem because he has no jam,
Fri 11 Aug 2006, 22:43,
archived)
I love..that ian huntley is STILL up as ian "daz" huntley
( Beastmeter Small But Scrappy,
Fri 11 Aug 2006, 22:46,
archived)
damnthey're fucking quick on that
( Beastmeter Small But Scrappy,
Fri 11 Aug 2006, 22:39,
archived)
May I interject one thing?Though I don't disagree with taking the MODs of wiki to task, you wouldn't like it (or rather, I WOULDN'T like it) if the same thing were done here.
Wikipedia is a good and useful site, and acting like trolls and posting what you've done here is going to cause two things to happen:
1) You'll all get banned from there, and they'll change the way they let people edit entries
2) Since you're b3tans, you might ALSO get banned from here, because an internet troll is an internet troll, and I don't want you around if that's all you are.
So.. take the occasional prod; do so here. But now it's gone past the simple single or few attacks.
So stop already, enough...
(Wikipedia is a good and useful site, and acting like trolls and posting what you've done here is going to cause two things to happen:
1) You'll all get banned from there, and they'll change the way they let people edit entries
2) Since you're b3tans, you might ALSO get banned from here, because an internet troll is an internet troll, and I don't want you around if that's all you are.
So.. take the occasional prod; do so here. But now it's gone past the simple single or few attacks.
So stop already, enough...
Scoopzilla http://www.slapwatch.com now get to fuck,
Fri 11 Aug 2006, 22:47,
archived)
Dad, can I have the car keys?go on.... come on Dad!
M3Essential and The Essentials. LIVE!,
Fri 11 Aug 2006, 22:49,
archived)
NO!*slaps*
oh... shit, alright son...
*hands box of condoms and a hundred dollar bill*
HAVE FUN!
(oh... shit, alright son...
*hands box of condoms and a hundred dollar bill*
HAVE FUN!
Scoopzilla http://www.slapwatch.com now get to fuck,
Fri 11 Aug 2006, 22:50,
archived)
Thanks Dad!*gets drunk, crashes car*
I do agree to some extent with not pissing off other messageboards btw
M3Essential and The Essentials. LIVE!,
Fri 11 Aug 2006, 22:51,
archived)
MY VINTAGE 1978 Ford PINTO!!!!!NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOooooooooooooooo!!!!!!
*cuts off hand*
Meh, I'm a big fan of the Golden Rule. I know I'd hate that happening here.
(*cuts off hand*
Meh, I'm a big fan of the Golden Rule. I know I'd hate that happening here.
Scoopzilla http://www.slapwatch.com now get to fuck,
Fri 11 Aug 2006, 22:57,
archived)
I do agree on principle.Think I got a bit carried away there...
But I disagree that 'Wikipedia is a good and useful site'.
Wikipedia is useful so long as you know what it is, but I have seen too many people quote from some of the more spurious pages as a serious reference.
And I've seen too many people who genuinely know a subject have their well-meaning edits reversed back to school-level standards of knowledge by the moderators.
In my opinion, before it can really be useful, wikipedia needs a large banner at the top of each page saying "Warning: may not be true".
Or perhaps, "may contain nuts". :-)
(But I disagree that 'Wikipedia is a good and useful site'.
Wikipedia is useful so long as you know what it is, but I have seen too many people quote from some of the more spurious pages as a serious reference.
And I've seen too many people who genuinely know a subject have their well-meaning edits reversed back to school-level standards of knowledge by the moderators.
In my opinion, before it can really be useful, wikipedia needs a large banner at the top of each page saying "Warning: may not be true".
Or perhaps, "may contain nuts". :-)
The Glum Reaper cannot solve your problem because he has no jam,
Fri 11 Aug 2006, 22:53,
archived)
father christmas is a made up character
Ironman tetsuo Back once again with the renegade mastah!,
Fri 11 Aug 2006, 22:58,
archived)
No!But wikipedia says he's real!
*clickity*
Well it does now...
(*clickity*
Well it does now...
The Glum Reaper cannot solve your problem because he has no jam,
Fri 11 Aug 2006, 22:59,
archived)
ha ha :P Ironman tetsuo Back once again with the renegade mastah!,
Fri 11 Aug 2006, 23:01,
archived)
jahMaybe I'm a bit overboard though too...
a warning label would be good. Maybe the DO need to change what they do and do not let through.
but.. is that TRUE internet freedom?
www.wearetheweb.org/
Truth is... YES, because in the end the site owner pays for the bandwidth.
(a warning label would be good. Maybe the DO need to change what they do and do not let through.
but.. is that TRUE internet freedom?
www.wearetheweb.org/
Truth is... YES, because in the end the site owner pays for the bandwidth.
Scoopzilla http://www.slapwatch.com now get to fuck,
Fri 11 Aug 2006, 23:01,
archived)
For some reason...I read that link as 'wear the web'. I was thinking it would be some sort of fantastic intermaweb cape, which you can wear...
..and fly!
Wooooosh!
Oooh I think I might go make an image of that now.
(..and fly!
Wooooosh!
Oooh I think I might go make an image of that now.
The Glum Reaper cannot solve your problem because he has no jam,
Fri 11 Aug 2006, 23:06,
archived)
I agree, but I feel I might have expressed it moresuccinctly (minus the grammar correction),
www.b3ta.com/board/6220093
(www.b3ta.com/board/6220093
Purple Onion,
Fri 11 Aug 2006, 23:04,
archived)