
A cry baby if I'm not mistaken. Chorus indeed *tisk*
( ,
Wed 7 Mar 2007, 13:23,
archived)

www.musiciansbuy.com/mmMBCOM/Images/TC_940SCF011_dw.jpg
with knobs and switches and things
( ,
Wed 7 Mar 2007, 13:25,
archived)
with knobs and switches and things

Flanger!
But personally I wouldn't want a flanger build into a chorus. Both work well together and that seems only to be able to do either or. Putting a phaser in there would be just as bad:P
( ,
Wed 7 Mar 2007, 13:29,
archived)
But personally I wouldn't want a flanger build into a chorus. Both work well together and that seems only to be able to do either or. Putting a phaser in there would be just as bad:P

Plus, a whole line of boss effects pedals looks much more impressive on stage than one fancy box with lots of switches that pretends to do them all.
Even though it is annoying having to keep healthy batteries in all of them
( ,
Wed 7 Mar 2007, 13:32,
archived)
Even though it is annoying having to keep healthy batteries in all of them

All I have is an Overdrive now, but I don't really need that as my Marshall has an Overdrive channel
( ,
Wed 7 Mar 2007, 13:36,
archived)

Deceptively noisy for something so small.
( ,
Wed 7 Mar 2007, 13:37,
archived)

for recreational drug abuse in its myriad of forms!
( ,
Wed 7 Mar 2007, 13:41,
archived)

that works by mixing a signal with a slightly delayed copy of itself creating a comb-filter effect
( ,
Wed 7 Mar 2007, 13:22,
archived)

Woo for you!
*etc.
( ,
Wed 7 Mar 2007, 13:24,
archived)
*etc.

and replace it with something about nulls in the frequency domain at multiples of the reciprocal of the delay time
or something
( ,
Wed 7 Mar 2007, 13:26,
archived)
or something

i designed and built a midi-to-cv converter, and have various midi projects in the pipeline when i can be arsed to buy a decent power supply
*runs away in shame*
( ,
Wed 7 Mar 2007, 13:32,
archived)
*runs away in shame*


edit: from re-reading your reply i think i get you. yes it's a very similar mechanism, the delay between your ears being created by distance and the speed of sound.
/geeking it up at lunch blog

I think you are:P Or he is. I studied psycho acoustics for quite quite a while.
But we'll test fuckster with what is the speed of sound?
( ,
Wed 7 Mar 2007, 13:36,
archived)
But we'll test fuckster with what is the speed of sound?

... but isn't it about 290m/s?
( ,
Wed 7 Mar 2007, 13:40,
archived)

Altitude is not really that much of a factor in audio. But I was looking for the standard that is 343mps at 20c.
Classically used to set your delays.
The height of a 100Hz sinwave?:P
( ,
Wed 7 Mar 2007, 13:41,
archived)
Classically used to set your delays.
The height of a 100Hz sinwave?:P

NEXT!
( ,
Wed 7 Mar 2007, 13:43,
archived)

But not that many gigs have been done on Everest you know.
Possibly something I saw in a magazine or when I was lecturing live sound at university:P
( ,
Wed 7 Mar 2007, 13:50,
archived)
Possibly something I saw in a magazine or when I was lecturing live sound at university:P

but one day we'll all be playing gigs at flying parties, and we'll have to fiddle the delays on the video screens to match.
3 feet high, and rising...
( ,
Wed 7 Mar 2007, 13:44,
archived)
3 feet high, and rising...