first 2 are happy popcorn munching films, third is just really has really bad timng in it.half the film is a snooze fest of peter parker being a wet fart, the other half has brief moments of enjoyment, but it's too little, too late.
i'd be a great critic :)
(i'd be a great critic :)
monstrinho do biscoito teeeshurts = www.nogunarmy.com,
Mon 7 May 2007, 12:02,
archived)
300.utterly bonkers, unintentionally funny, but hugely enjoyable. should have been filmed in 3D to ramp the battle-kitsch up to 11.
without all the slo motion, this film would last 30mins.
(without all the slo motion, this film would last 30mins.
monstrinho do biscoito teeeshurts = www.nogunarmy.com,
Mon 7 May 2007, 12:10,
archived)
you are good!no, rily, tell us more! Have you seen "The Host" yet? Or maybe you don't do films with subtitles?
(
Alfred Pimble uninspired since,
Mon 7 May 2007, 12:19,
archived)
the host is very good in partsbut has some incredibly dull (if, thankfully, short) parts.
the creature itself is great. and one of the characters has a bow and arrow, for fucks sake! (the only thing that made blade trinity bearable).
(the creature itself is great. and one of the characters has a bow and arrow, for fucks sake! (the only thing that made blade trinity bearable).
The Alchemist king of the needlessly complicated,
Mon 7 May 2007, 12:25,
archived)
i do like foreign filmsbut i haven't seeen this one. mainly because the monster looked like the one from Tremours.
if it's subtitles you like. see pan's labyrinth. my new favourite film of all time.
(if it's subtitles you like. see pan's labyrinth. my new favourite film of all time.
monstrinho do biscoito teeeshurts = www.nogunarmy.com,
Mon 7 May 2007, 12:26,
archived)
yes yeswith just a little bit more gore than you would like in what would otherwise be a kiddie-film fairy-tale wrapper. Gotta be subtitles for something like that because dubbing destroys the poetry of the script.
( Alfred Pimble uninspired since,
Mon 7 May 2007, 12:30,
archived)