
shame the film is so boooring. that's 2 hours i won't get back.
( ,
Mon 7 May 2007, 11:59,
archived)

and only seen half of spiderman2.
hmm. i dont really like the style of the films.
( ,
Mon 7 May 2007, 12:00,
archived)
hmm. i dont really like the style of the films.

half the film is a snooze fest of peter parker being a wet fart, the other half has brief moments of enjoyment, but it's too little, too late.
i'd be a great critic :)
( ,
Mon 7 May 2007, 12:02,
archived)
i'd be a great critic :)

utterly bonkers, unintentionally funny, but hugely enjoyable. should have been filmed in 3D to ramp the battle-kitsch up to 11.
without all the slo motion, this film would last 30mins.
( ,
Mon 7 May 2007, 12:10,
archived)
without all the slo motion, this film would last 30mins.

no, rily, tell us more! Have you seen "The Host" yet? Or maybe you don't do films with subtitles?
( ,
Mon 7 May 2007, 12:19,
archived)

but has some incredibly dull (if, thankfully, short) parts.
the creature itself is great. and one of the characters has a bow and arrow, for fucks sake! (the only thing that made blade trinity bearable).
( ,
Mon 7 May 2007, 12:25,
archived)
the creature itself is great. and one of the characters has a bow and arrow, for fucks sake! (the only thing that made blade trinity bearable).

but i haven't seeen this one. mainly because the monster looked like the one from Tremours.
if it's subtitles you like. see pan's labyrinth. my new favourite film of all time.
( ,
Mon 7 May 2007, 12:26,
archived)
if it's subtitles you like. see pan's labyrinth. my new favourite film of all time.