b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » XXX » Message 7448166 (Thread)

# You seem to have given this a lot of thought
I agree for the most part. Having had a friend who was falsely accused of something similar, I hope this is all bullshit
(Mrs Trellis GIN, Fri 27 Jul 2007, 9:52, archived)
# I thought he has been found to have pornography?
(I helped save b3ta! LordManley twitter.com/LordManley, Fri 27 Jul 2007, 9:53, archived)
# he had kid porn on his laptop

so as far as I'm concerned he should be locked away to fucking rot
(I helped save b3ta! prodigy69 broke b3ta and made everyone leave, Fri 27 Jul 2007, 10:06, archived)
# What about Pete Townshend..
ok, so it states somewhere that just paid for access and was found not to have any images on pc etc.
But so what, how come he got away with it? That was for alleged 'research' too.
And for a bit of dodgy humour.. can't beat this
www.youtube.com/watch?v=8CBgIxA2umM
(I helped save b3ta! nel Roland Rat and Kevvviiinnnnn, Fri 27 Jul 2007, 10:20, archived)
# He didn't get away with it.
He was not locked up as he was not considered a threat, but IIRC he is a registered sex offender?
(I helped save b3ta! LordManley twitter.com/LordManley, Fri 27 Jul 2007, 10:22, archived)
# Yes, is still on the register
i believe. So got away with it basically, with a slapped wrists. May have been innocent but he should have known better really.
So is their a difference between accessing/viewing/saving/storing images?
(I helped save b3ta! nel Roland Rat and Kevvviiinnnnn, Fri 27 Jul 2007, 10:31, archived)
# I think that paying is the key.
If he looks at child porn he finds in his grandad's loft then maybe he is just stopping another child being abused, but if he buys it then he is encouraging another child to be abused to make money.
(I helped save b3ta! LordManley twitter.com/LordManley, Fri 27 Jul 2007, 10:43, archived)