b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » XXX » Message 7448118 (Thread)

# Chris Langham - suggest anyone interested listens to the lyrics here
www.youtube.com/watch?v=uLh2F-2U740
(JonKing2006 Jonathan King, Fri 27 Jul 2007, 9:38, archived)
# What?
(I helped save b3ta! LordManley twitter.com/LordManley, Fri 27 Jul 2007, 9:39, archived)
# What?
(I helped save b3ta! LordManley twitter.com/LordManley, Fri 27 Jul 2007, 9:40, archived)
# YES!
(I helped save b3ta! LordManley twitter.com/LordManley, Fri 27 Jul 2007, 9:40, archived)
# Is it wrong to hope that Chris Langham was abused by a paedophile when he was young, as he is claiming?
Because I've always found the guy really funny and if he wasn't abused and is just a perv then that would be very disappointing but on the other hand, if he was abused and he's just been screwed up by it, hasn't abused any kids and only looked at some child porn because he was screwed up by his own experience, it would still be OK to like his comedy, wouldn't it?
(I helped save b3ta! Afinkawan Yes I can hear you Clem Fandango, Fri 27 Jul 2007, 9:49, archived)
# nope!
you must burn your 'Not the nine 'o' clock news videos along with Wacko Jacko's albums . . .


(I helped save b3ta! Sir Aunty Grampa Dave the Hat - enjoying a post-meridian muncheon - Ta! Cannaoogim!?, Fri 27 Jul 2007, 9:50, archived)
# NOOOOOOOO!!!
But what about People Like Us, the first series of The Thick Of It and his appearances on Smith And Jones?


I don't mind burning Carry on Columbus though.
(I helped save b3ta! Afinkawan Yes I can hear you Clem Fandango, Fri 27 Jul 2007, 9:52, archived)
# Don't forget the Muppets!
He wrote a lot of those too...
(Mrs Trellis GIN, Fri 27 Jul 2007, 9:55, archived)
# You seem to have given this a lot of thought
I agree for the most part. Having had a friend who was falsely accused of something similar, I hope this is all bullshit
(Mrs Trellis GIN, Fri 27 Jul 2007, 9:52, archived)
# I thought he has been found to have pornography?
(I helped save b3ta! LordManley twitter.com/LordManley, Fri 27 Jul 2007, 9:53, archived)
# he had kid porn on his laptop

so as far as I'm concerned he should be locked away to fucking rot
(I helped save b3ta! prodigy69 broke b3ta and made everyone leave, Fri 27 Jul 2007, 10:06, archived)
# What about Pete Townshend..
ok, so it states somewhere that just paid for access and was found not to have any images on pc etc.
But so what, how come he got away with it? That was for alleged 'research' too.
And for a bit of dodgy humour.. can't beat this
www.youtube.com/watch?v=8CBgIxA2umM
(I helped save b3ta! nel Roland Rat and Kevvviiinnnnn, Fri 27 Jul 2007, 10:20, archived)
# He didn't get away with it.
He was not locked up as he was not considered a threat, but IIRC he is a registered sex offender?
(I helped save b3ta! LordManley twitter.com/LordManley, Fri 27 Jul 2007, 10:22, archived)
# Yes, is still on the register
i believe. So got away with it basically, with a slapped wrists. May have been innocent but he should have known better really.
So is their a difference between accessing/viewing/saving/storing images?
(I helped save b3ta! nel Roland Rat and Kevvviiinnnnn, Fri 27 Jul 2007, 10:31, archived)
# I think that paying is the key.
If he looks at child porn he finds in his grandad's loft then maybe he is just stopping another child being abused, but if he buys it then he is encouraging another child to be abused to make money.
(I helped save b3ta! LordManley twitter.com/LordManley, Fri 27 Jul 2007, 10:43, archived)
# No.
If he has paid for child pornography or, indeed, done anything which encouraged a trade which causes pre-pubescant children to be abused then he needs to be punished.

It doesn't stop his jokes being funny, just as I still like my Gary Glitter tape that I have in the car.

I find paedophiles to be a bit sad. i don't fancy children, so it is easy for me not to abuse them, but if I did - well, it must be a hard life, much like being gay in 1960.

No possible excuse though - they have to fight it - if I was raped as a child would that mean it was okay for me to rape someone? If I got run down by a drunk driver then it'd be okay for me to drink and drive?
(I helped save b3ta! LordManley twitter.com/LordManley, Fri 27 Jul 2007, 9:52, archived)
# Clearly it wouldn't be
which is why the 'if he hasn't abused any kids' disclaimer.

It would be understandable why he might have seen some dodgy pics though. I have no idea how much they are talking about.
(I helped save b3ta! Afinkawan Yes I can hear you Clem Fandango, Fri 27 Jul 2007, 9:55, archived)
# It does sound like his defence is a bit shonky
he doesn't deny having the pics and looking at them to create a character that wasn't even a paedo (according to Mary Whitehouse) doesn't really convince me.


(I helped save b3ta! Sir Aunty Grampa Dave the Hat - enjoying a post-meridian muncheon - Ta! Cannaoogim!?, Fri 27 Jul 2007, 9:59, archived)
# AKA The Pete Townsend Defence
or at least a variation of.
(I helped save b3ta! Hamster Trippin' aka Mr. Titts, Fri 27 Jul 2007, 10:00, archived)
# Not to be confused with the Sue Townsend Defence...
"Honestly officer I never knew he was thirteen and three quarters"
(I helped save b3ta! Hamster Trippin' aka Mr. Titts, Fri 27 Jul 2007, 10:01, archived)
# I don't care
obtaining pics is enough.

It pays people to abuse children.
(I helped save b3ta! LordManley twitter.com/LordManley, Fri 27 Jul 2007, 10:02, archived)
# err . . . yes
Like I said he didn't convince me and even if it's true I don't think that it excuses him


(I helped save b3ta! Sir Aunty Grampa Dave the Hat - enjoying a post-meridian muncheon - Ta! Cannaoogim!?, Fri 27 Jul 2007, 10:09, archived)
# 'ning.
I agree with you. "Pictures of child abuse", what does it mean? Well in cases I've seen reported it mostly means violent torture and destruction of a child's, or even a baby's unformed sexual organs and sometimes includes murder, all supervised and filmed by someone who is supposed to be the guardian of the child. Being abused oneself ought to be the biggest incentive to keep away from this kind of stuff. I'm afraid I can't sanction "innocently viewing some pictures" under any circumstances
(I helped save b3ta! edjogs Collared doves are shit., Fri 27 Jul 2007, 10:11, archived)
# I agree
although I accept that someone may possibly view pics without fully realising the consequences of their action.

Like buying some grass and not thinking about the crime the money goes towards
(I helped save b3ta! Griffin Saver Something, something, 2006, something., Fri 27 Jul 2007, 10:19, archived)
# I go along with that principle
but in this case we are talking about pictures of children being MUTILATED by their guardians or with their guardian's consent. It is beyond my powers of imagination to believe that doing it or watching it being done can ever be innocent.
(I helped save b3ta! edjogs Collared doves are shit., Fri 27 Jul 2007, 10:24, archived)
# I wasn't aware of the nature of the pics
for some people - this only justice is prolonged public beating
(I helped save b3ta! Griffin Saver Something, something, 2006, something., Fri 27 Jul 2007, 10:29, archived)
# I'm not being sarky but
the clue is in "child abuse". It doesn't mean pictures of someone sending their kid to bed without watching CBeebies.
(I helped save b3ta! edjogs Collared doves are shit., Fri 27 Jul 2007, 10:37, archived)
# it is you, isn't it
/not a patch on Snoopi though
(I helped save b3ta! The Great Architect is still waiting for his account to be deleted on, Fri 27 Jul 2007, 9:40, archived)
# It's not a patch on
Everybody's going to the Moon to fuck children either

Morning!
(I helped save b3ta! Hamster Trippin' aka Mr. Titts, Fri 27 Jul 2007, 9:54, archived)
# morning sir!
(I helped save b3ta! The Great Architect is still waiting for his account to be deleted on, Fri 27 Jul 2007, 10:07, archived)
# I wish we had a board for posting links on.
(I helped save b3ta! Afinkawan Yes I can hear you Clem Fandango, Fri 27 Jul 2007, 9:43, archived)
# but we do
(pdjpdj, Fri 27 Jul 2007, 9:46, archived)
#
ah! you were being sarcastic
(pdjpdj, Fri 27 Jul 2007, 9:47, archived)
# And had a reminder about said board about the posting boxes
(I helped save b3ta! hanke murphy, I'm a mess, Fri 27 Jul 2007, 9:48, archived)
# ^ this with more sense
(I helped save b3ta! Dixipoos Bye Bye Blackbird, Fri 27 Jul 2007, 9:50, archived)
# ^This
I might email Rob and ask him to start a links board and then put a message whenever you try to post on this board saying something like:

Posting a link? Consider using the links board.
(I helped save b3ta! Afinkawan Yes I can hear you Clem Fandango, Fri 27 Jul 2007, 9:50, archived)
# controversial
(I helped save b3ta! Mighty Nibus who dares gins | @nibus, Fri 27 Jul 2007, 9:52, archived)
# Maybe he did consider it
Then thought "fuck you b3ta - and all of your mums".
(I helped save b3ta! Dixipoos Bye Bye Blackbird, Fri 27 Jul 2007, 9:55, archived)
# Don't be surprised
if your post makes us believe that you have a very sinister reason for publishing it.
(Reply copied and pasted from /links, this sort of thing doesn't warrant the effort of typing out twice)
(I helped save b3ta! edjogs Collared doves are shit., Fri 27 Jul 2007, 10:21, archived)