
I take it you've read it?
Read it again.
( ,
Sun 24 Feb 2008, 19:57,
archived)
Read it again.

I think I read it in, like, 5th grade? Fuck! That's aages ago. I will reread it, then.
( ,
Sun 24 Feb 2008, 20:08,
archived)

'Course not.
I hafta go now. Stupid godlovers. *hugs* See you later, dear.
( ,
Sun 24 Feb 2008, 20:23,
archived)
I hafta go now. Stupid godlovers. *hugs* See you later, dear.

Nineteen Eighty-Four (the title is not numeric, and considering you've been having a go at people for being lazy with their english you should know better) is far superior. animal farm is a great book, and an incredibly intelligent analogy, but not as good as eighty-four
down and out is a difficult read, but well worth the effort
( ,
Sun 24 Feb 2008, 20:02,
archived)
down and out is a difficult read, but well worth the effort

I like Animal Farm because of the fact that I'm a history student. I study it anyway.
Nineteen Enighty-Four is entirely fictitious, despite its similarities with the world today, and I don't like it as much.
Maybe YOU like it more, but I don't.
( ,
Sun 24 Feb 2008, 20:05,
archived)
Nineteen Enighty-Four is entirely fictitious, despite its similarities with the world today, and I don't like it as much.
Maybe YOU like it more, but I don't.

Animal farm is also completely fictitious, it is just based around events in Russia and the USSR in the 20th century.
eighty-four is also more inventive and more structured.
( ,
Sun 24 Feb 2008, 20:10,
archived)
eighty-four is also more inventive and more structured.

just substituting the characters and settings.
I agree 1984 (oh shut up) is more inventive, and I repsect the fact that you like it more, but I don't.
( ,
Sun 24 Feb 2008, 20:16,
archived)
I agree 1984 (oh shut up) is more inventive, and I repsect the fact that you like it more, but I don't.

it's a good 50 years starting with marx's original theories and ending with the start of the downfall of the USSR.
but it's still fictional. as i said up there ^^^^ somewhere, it's a fantastic political analogy, but it is (deliberately) far from the facts.
if it wasn't it wouldn't have stood the test of time. I first read it when i was about 8, and obviously didn't get any of the political references. also, if it was the full story of the revolution it'd be dull. as apart from the major events (which are all referenced) it was (as most revs are) quite dull
( ,
Sun 24 Feb 2008, 20:28,
archived)
but it's still fictional. as i said up there ^^^^ somewhere, it's a fantastic political analogy, but it is (deliberately) far from the facts.
if it wasn't it wouldn't have stood the test of time. I first read it when i was about 8, and obviously didn't get any of the political references. also, if it was the full story of the revolution it'd be dull. as apart from the major events (which are all referenced) it was (as most revs are) quite dull