
if it's made in photoshop it's called a Vexel and can't be resized without loss to the image
if it's made in Illustrator then it's a true vector and can be resized to the size of the moon without loss to the image!
:)
( ,
Sat 8 Mar 2008, 10:43,
archived)
if it's made in Illustrator then it's a true vector and can be resized to the size of the moon without loss to the image!
:)

Paths, for example, and text are still vectors even in photoshop, you see.
Also: 'Ning!
( ,
Sat 8 Mar 2008, 10:45,
archived)
Also: 'Ning!

Vector paths doesn't make them fucking vector images for the last time,
photoshop makes Vexels
Vector + Pixel = Vexel.

You can't make a vector graphic, but Photoshop DOES use vectors.
( ,
Sat 8 Mar 2008, 10:59,
archived)

the only thing that's close to a vector in photoshop is the text, that's it!
NOTHING ELSE.
the end.
( ,
Sat 8 Mar 2008, 11:05,
archived)
NOTHING ELSE.
the end.


And I did say the text, didn't I?
And paths are vectors until you stroke/fill them.
( ,
Sat 8 Mar 2008, 11:06,
archived)
And paths are vectors until you stroke/fill them.

\o/ early morning arguments!
Love ya really.
( ,
Sat 8 Mar 2008, 11:13,
archived)
Love ya really.

"Paths, for example, are still vectors"
No they aren't, a vector, in this context is the spline based coloured-in result that makes a vector image. As opposed to a Raster Image
A path is a path, yes it's spline based with bezier controls, but IT IS A PATH!!!
( ,
Sat 8 Mar 2008, 11:18,
archived)
No they aren't, a vector, in this context is the spline based coloured-in result that makes a vector image. As opposed to a Raster Image
A path is a path, yes it's spline based with bezier controls, but IT IS A PATH!!!

do we get a prize for simply trying to help you understand the difference in terminology of something?
( ,
Sat 8 Mar 2008, 11:26,
archived)