
listen to this as a sample:
"Thucydides, in his Peloponnesian War, describes the most rigorous methods for choosing which sources are useful and which are erroneous. In his history he deals with a recent war in his own lifetime, yet he is sure not to trust the first source made available to him, including his own impressions, aware that a single person’s memory of an event can be mistaken. "
fun, eh?
( ,
Wed 16 Apr 2008, 3:42,
archived)
"Thucydides, in his Peloponnesian War, describes the most rigorous methods for choosing which sources are useful and which are erroneous. In his history he deals with a recent war in his own lifetime, yet he is sure not to trust the first source made available to him, including his own impressions, aware that a single person’s memory of an event can be mistaken. "
fun, eh?

I think I'm going to try and find a DVD of Mars Attacks.
Good luck, sir!
( ,
Wed 16 Apr 2008, 3:45,
archived)
Good luck, sir!


i have a 1600-2000 word essay made of four questions. this one is "According to the non-Biblical writers cited below, what are the best sources for writing about the past? How does this compare with luke 1:1-4? i the writer of act was not a follower of peter then i what way could he legitimise the events he chronicles?" THIS IS THE FIRST OF FOUR SUCH QUESTIONS! gonna be an all nighter...
( ,
Wed 16 Apr 2008, 3:49,
archived)

well i liked them when i was a kid. especially the illustrations. i think they would be the best source.
( ,
Wed 16 Apr 2008, 3:52,
archived)

It's the first rule if one thinks about it.
"Everything you know is wrong!"
And you work/start from there.
( ,
Wed 16 Apr 2008, 3:45,
archived)
"Everything you know is wrong!"
And you work/start from there.

that placing any weight in biblical truth is flawed from the outset
( ,
Wed 16 Apr 2008, 3:51,
archived)

[/;-D
( ,
Wed 16 Apr 2008, 3:54,
archived)

( , Wed 16 Apr 2008, 4:07, archived)

i love this poster so much
www.horror-wood.com/2nd_mi4.jpg
( ,
Wed 16 Apr 2008, 4:12,
archived)
www.horror-wood.com/2nd_mi4.jpg