Home » Messageboard »
XXX » Message 8317885
(Thread )
most vectors are just tracing though, aren't they?
(
mr spoons ,
Thu 24 Apr 2008, 19:48,
archived )
I don't think tracing counts as a 'real' vector
I'm pretty sure there were some arguments about what exactly vectoring was a while back
(
Pavlov'sDog is all out of pavlova ,
Thu 24 Apr 2008, 19:50,
archived )
These arguments about what is a true vector bore my saggy moobs off
(
Dixipoos Bye Bye Blackbird ,
Thu 24 Apr 2008, 19:51,
archived )
It's ok
they're gone now
(
Pavlov'sDog is all out of pavlova ,
Thu 24 Apr 2008, 19:53,
archived )
you need a better fitness regime then
(
mutster101 fell over ,
Thu 24 Apr 2008, 19:53,
archived )
Me too.
Particularly given that everything posted on b3ta ends up being rasterised anyway, regardless of how it's originally made.
(
mofaha ┐( ˘_˘)┌ ʅ(́◡◝)ʃ ,
Thu 24 Apr 2008, 19:56,
archived )
*prolongs annoying argument*
.pngs are alright aren't they?
(
mr spoons ,
Thu 24 Apr 2008, 19:58,
archived )
They're still pixel based and not vector based.
(
StickFigureNinja is worried he may be on the list ,
Thu 24 Apr 2008, 20:01,
archived )
oh noes!
i'm going to look at b3ta through a cathode ray oscilloscope from now on
(
mr spoons ,
Thu 24 Apr 2008, 20:04,
archived )
What you really want is a modified collection of shird world orphans
who sketch the output really quickly on to paper and display the screen to you via the medium of flickbooks.
(
StickFigureNinja is worried he may be on the list ,
Thu 24 Apr 2008, 20:05,
archived )
:)
if i was modifying orphans, it would be with massive spoilers and 20in rims.
(
mr spoons ,
Thu 24 Apr 2008, 20:07,
archived )
Haha
everything's alright!
(
mofaha ┐( ˘_˘)┌ ʅ(́◡◝)ʃ ,
Thu 24 Apr 2008, 20:01,
archived )
no
it's harder than tracing and thus art
(
hanke murphy, I'm a mess ,
Thu 24 Apr 2008, 19:50,
archived )
thank you :)
(
mutster101 fell over ,
Thu 24 Apr 2008, 19:52,
archived )
okay. forget i said 'tracing'.
art=hard to-do stuff
(
mr spoons ,
Thu 24 Apr 2008, 19:52,
archived )
Hahaha
why on earth does art have to be hard to do? I really don't get that.
(
mofaha ┐( ˘_˘)┌ ʅ(́◡◝)ʃ ,
Thu 24 Apr 2008, 19:57,
archived )
that was my point.
what's an appropriate sarcastic smiley? :s
(
mr spoons ,
Thu 24 Apr 2008, 19:59,
archived )
I have an idea. Let's go back to the late 80's
and add NOT! after sarcastic statements. edit: NOOOTTTTT!
(
mofaha ┐( ˘_˘)┌ ʅ(́◡◝)ʃ ,
Thu 24 Apr 2008, 20:02,
archived )
oh that sounds like something us cool board members would be interested in doing, Mofaha
NOOOOTTTT!!
(
hanke murphy, I'm a mess ,
Thu 24 Apr 2008, 20:04,
archived )
Well that was a totally unexpected response.
NOOOOOTTTT!!!
(
mofaha ┐( ˘_˘)┌ ʅ(́◡◝)ʃ ,
Thu 24 Apr 2008, 20:07,
archived )
well, you seem like you're down with it
NOOOOOOOOOTTTTTTTTT!
(
mutster101 fell over ,
Thu 24 Apr 2008, 20:09,
archived )
EXCELLENT!
*air guitars then flys off in a phone box*
(
StickFigureNinja is worried he may be on the list ,
Thu 24 Apr 2008, 20:04,
archived )
Now what is and isn't art is a far more complicated matter than "oh it's harder"
(
StickFigureNinja is worried he may be on the list ,
Thu 24 Apr 2008, 19:56,
archived )
caution
my above comment may contain traces of irony
(
hanke murphy, I'm a mess ,
Thu 24 Apr 2008, 19:57,
archived )
i'm never sure how to take it when people say that
(
mutster101 fell over ,
Thu 24 Apr 2008, 19:51,
archived )
oh, dear.
i chose my words poorly. i think vectors and rotoscoping, when done properly, look amazing. i just presumed that similar techniques applied to both. am i off the hook?
(
mr spoons ,
Thu 24 Apr 2008, 19:54,
archived )
Technukilly
anything posted on here cannot be a vector, since it's been rasterized into jpeg/png/gif. The true vector remains in whatever-the-hell format it was created in Or some such
(
The Neville What what what ,
Thu 24 Apr 2008, 19:54,
archived )
True, but I feel it's also fair to say that
being called a reference is undoubtedly in reference to the 'method' that was used to create the work. Although, people could post links to a swf if they so chose to keep it vectory.
(
StickFigureNinja is worried he may be on the list ,
Thu 24 Apr 2008, 20:00,
archived )
Indeed, indeed
But to satisfy those who try to claim that if something was done in paint, say, but it looks very "vectorish" it is a vector, then I say, yes. Why not. Let it be a vector if it looks as such
(
The Neville What what what ,
Thu 24 Apr 2008, 20:08,
archived )
Hide
Hide post If you want to unhide this post later, click the "update profile" link in the top navigation bar, and scroll down to the bottom.
Ignore
Shush them a week You will be blisfully unaware of this user for just one week
Mute user You will not see this users messages again
Block user You will not see them and they will not see you