Home » Messageboard »
XXX » Message 8380113
(Thread )
aaaaaawwww
*hugs* i won't steal your piss, i promise ;)
(
Smash Monkey lowering the tone of the whole internet ,
Sun 18 May 2008, 12:10,
archived )
really
because no one truly understands ...
(
k3b/-\b Peace man. ,
Sun 18 May 2008, 12:16,
archived )
i don't understand
but i'm willing to learn ;)
(
Smash Monkey lowering the tone of the whole internet ,
Sun 18 May 2008, 12:27,
archived )
oh ok
Consider a cavity in a fluid, with a time dependent pressure p(t), the radius R(t) of the bubble is:
(
k3b/-\b Peace man. ,
Sun 18 May 2008, 12:32,
archived )
sheirly
that first part of the equation should just be R-(p&-1) as dividing by P would cancel the others out....however, how can you have infinity in the equation?
(
Sir T. Skellington ,
Sun 18 May 2008, 12:36,
archived )
he's dividing by rho, not p
rho is density, p(R) the pressure at radius R, p(infinity) the asymptotic limit of the pressure as R is tended to infinity
(
boris the spider ,
Sun 18 May 2008, 12:38,
archived )
ahhh i didnt see the rho
and well explained!
(
Sir T. Skellington ,
Sun 18 May 2008, 12:39,
archived )
practice
(
boris the spider ,
Sun 18 May 2008, 12:40,
archived )
stop stealling my thesis
(
k3b/-\b Peace man. ,
Sun 18 May 2008, 12:41,
archived )
Science is theft
(
boris the spider ,
Sun 18 May 2008, 12:45,
archived )
Yeah I know I suppose I stole that from Rayleigh and Plesset...
*wistles*
(
k3b/-\b Peace man. ,
Sun 18 May 2008, 12:48,
archived )
the thing on the bottom is a rho not a p
and the infinity is a subscript on a p, which is like the pressure at an infinite distance from the bubble (cavity)
(
k3b/-\b Peace man. ,
Sun 18 May 2008, 12:39,
archived )
psst
http://www.b3ta.com/board/8380185
(
boris the spider ,
Sun 18 May 2008, 12:41,
archived )
psssst
(
k3b/-\b Peace man. ,
Sun 18 May 2008, 12:44,
archived )
I've just had a sudden thought
that looks enormously like the equivalent of the Friedmann equation in a McVittie spacetime. I don't know what I could do with that but it might be worth looking back over an aborted project in the McVittie spacetime.... Hmmmm. Edit: I probably mean the Raychaudhuri equation rather than the Friedmann equation, since that's the same as the FLRW case.
(
boris the spider ,
Sun 18 May 2008, 12:37,
archived )
you win at science!
(
Sir T. Skellington ,
Sun 18 May 2008, 12:44,
archived )
god no
one tiny little pocket of it. i'm shit at the rest of it.
(
boris the spider ,
Sun 18 May 2008, 12:46,
archived )
I'm finding McVittie space-time hard to digest
*runs back to fluid dynamics*
(
k3b/-\b Peace man. ,
Sun 18 May 2008, 12:49,
archived )
That's painful
as is the naked singularity sitting on the event horizon when you try and chew it.
(
boris the spider ,
Sun 18 May 2008, 12:53,
archived )
phwoar naked???
I have a pole now...
(
k3b/-\b Peace man. ,
Sun 18 May 2008, 12:57,
archived )
I don't know what it would be like to stick your dick in a black hole
though I can hazard a guess, but I really don't know what it would be like to try and stick your dick through a naked singularity. Either way you probably wouldn't live to tell the tale.
(
boris the spider ,
Sun 18 May 2008, 13:52,
archived )
Hide
Hide post If you want to unhide this post later, click the "update profile" link in the top navigation bar, and scroll down to the bottom.
Ignore
Shush them a week You will be blisfully unaware of this user for just one week
Mute user You will not see this users messages again
Block user You will not see them and they will not see you