b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » XXX » Message 8383530 (Thread)

# I AM X-RAY!
\o/
(, Mon 19 May 2008, 20:03, archived)
# You know of him!?
(, Mon 19 May 2008, 20:05, archived)
# I *AM* X-RAY!
(, Mon 19 May 2008, 20:07, archived)
# Ooooh!
You are!? AWESOME!
(, Mon 19 May 2008, 20:07, archived)
# LIES!
:(

I wish I was X-ray.
(, Mon 19 May 2008, 20:42, archived)
# I'm X Ray and so's my wife!
(, Mon 19 May 2008, 20:08, archived)
# I am America, and so can you!
(, Mon 19 May 2008, 20:10, archived)
# I CAN SEE YOUR INSIDES!
I CAN CAUSE CANCER!
(, Mon 19 May 2008, 20:10, archived)
# I AM PREFERENTIALLY ABSORBED BY MATERIAL WITH A HIGHER ATOMIC NUMBER, THUS ALLOWING IMAGING OF THE HUMAN BODY
(, Mon 19 May 2008, 20:12, archived)
# Oooo hark at 'er with 'er university degree.
(, Mon 19 May 2008, 20:14, archived)
# Much of my degree is about the interaction of radiation with matter,
I couldn't help myself.
(, Mon 19 May 2008, 20:15, archived)
# Do they make sunglasses so you can see radiation rays yet?
(, Mon 19 May 2008, 20:19, archived)
# They probably could.
It'd be fucking expensive though. You could use scintillation crystals, probably.
(, Mon 19 May 2008, 20:21, archived)
# build me some :)
(, Mon 19 May 2008, 20:22, archived)
# I'll need several thousand pounds.
And bacon. Lots of bacon.
(, Mon 19 May 2008, 20:23, archived)
# how many several?
I has all the bacon :)
(, Mon 19 May 2008, 20:24, archived)
# Enough to feed me through the construction process.
I'll also need bread, butter, and mayonnaise.
(, Mon 19 May 2008, 20:27, archived)
# well I can provide everything but the manonaise
(, Mon 19 May 2008, 20:28, archived)
# Surely that would only allow you to see radiation which strikes the glasses though.
Which to be honest would be rubbish and about the same as a Geiger counter.
(, Mon 19 May 2008, 20:24, archived)
# In the same way as your eyes only see light which strikes them.
It might be pretty.
(, Mon 19 May 2008, 20:25, archived)
# It wouldn't be the same
unless the crystals release a photon in the same direction the original radiation was traveling in. If not, they'd just be opaque glasses that light up.

If you could put a layer of these crystals over the retina, that might work.
(, Mon 19 May 2008, 20:29, archived)
# That is true.
If the crystal were thin enough, it should give you a little blob of light around the interaction, if there's not too much reflection.
But if they were that thin, the amount of radiation you'd see would be a fraction of the amount destroying your eyes.
(, Mon 19 May 2008, 20:31, archived)
# You could build a pair of complete artificial eyes to wear in front of your real eyes
connected to some kind of screen on the back of the glasses.
(, Mon 19 May 2008, 20:44, archived)
# In this case, you may as well strap it to a little remote controlled thingumy,
so you don't have to go near the radioactivity.
(, Mon 19 May 2008, 20:51, archived)
# What!
And miss all the fun!
(, Mon 19 May 2008, 20:54, archived)
# Ok, ok, you can go in.
And you'll have a handy device showing you how badly you're being irradiated.
(, Mon 19 May 2008, 20:57, archived)
# Not only that, I could see exactly what was most radioactive
and run away from it or cosy up to it, according to taste. Might be handy in some kind of post-apocalyptic nightmare world.
(, Mon 19 May 2008, 21:01, archived)
# Not only that,
but I predict they'll make quite an impressive fashion statement.
(, Mon 19 May 2008, 21:02, archived)
# What he said.
(, Mon 19 May 2008, 20:33, archived)
# Another idea is to put a collimator behind the crystal,
to absorb the photons which don't head straight to the eye after being produced in the crystal.
This kind of thing en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Collimator.jpg
(, Mon 19 May 2008, 20:36, archived)
# needs more bacon
(, Mon 19 May 2008, 20:44, archived)
# That's all very well,
but the crystal would react to radiation coming from all angles, so it'd light up indiscriminately all over all the time.
...Needs a lens in front, possibly.
(, Mon 19 May 2008, 20:46, archived)
# This is also true.
You'd need another collimator on the front, then.
I appreciate these glasses are becoming rather chunky and inefficient.
(, Mon 19 May 2008, 20:49, archived)
# chunkiness is not an issue
(, Mon 19 May 2008, 21:05, archived)
# no i mean i want to see radiation
the waves n all
(, Mon 19 May 2008, 20:27, archived)
# Ah.
I suggest asking happytoast to make a nice animation of it.
(, Mon 19 May 2008, 20:29, archived)
# scieneces suck :(
(, Mon 19 May 2008, 20:41, archived)