Idiots who have been asked to proofread
but who have never heard of the word 'lasso' or the phrase 'a going concern'
I despair
( ,
Tue 27 May 2008, 10:05,
archived)
I despair
*hires*
not only do they not know these phrases, they suggest that they are in fact typos - and they recommend replacements which make absolutely no sense
( ,
Tue 27 May 2008, 10:10,
archived)
This is what you get for hiring people purely because
they've got quite funky socks.
I'd be better for you. Plus I'm jinglyjangly today so you'd hear me coming.
ARRIVING.
( ,
Tue 27 May 2008, 10:11,
archived)
I'd be better for you. Plus I'm jinglyjangly today so you'd hear me coming.
ARRIVING.
all attached to a piercing
*nods downwards*
*eyes raised in wonderment*
( ,
Tue 27 May 2008, 10:25,
archived)
*eyes raised in wonderment*
ha
I think the merits of the person in question don't extend to funky socks
she's possibly one of the most naively dim people I've ever met
( ,
Tue 27 May 2008, 10:17,
archived)
she's possibly one of the most naively dim people I've ever met
isn't that grounds for dismissal in a job where you need to be
worldly and knowledgable?
isn't it fairer to say 'listen, pet, you're not owwa good at this. You might want to think about trying harder or getting another job'? That way - she doesn't labour on for ages thinking she's good at a job she's not good at.
( ,
Tue 27 May 2008, 10:19,
archived)
isn't it fairer to say 'listen, pet, you're not owwa good at this. You might want to think about trying harder or getting another job'? That way - she doesn't labour on for ages thinking she's good at a job she's not good at.
what, pray tell
does one replace the typo of "lasso" with?
I am intrigued, but do not wish to subscribe to their newsletter as it will be full of grammatical and spelling errors.
( ,
Tue 27 May 2008, 10:19,
archived)
I am intrigued, but do not wish to subscribe to their newsletter as it will be full of grammatical and spelling errors.
Any word can be replaced with the words
'throbbing wankshaft' ... it's the universal filler.
( ,
Tue 27 May 2008, 10:20,
archived)
that would make for an interesting 200 page technical document
:D
( ,
Tue 27 May 2008, 10:21,
archived)
it was from an article titled thus:
original phrase:
[large corporation] lassoes nearly 5000 customers in first quarter
suggested new phrase:
[large corporation] loses nearly 5000 customers in first quarter
which I would say is a fairly major error of comprehension
( ,
Tue 27 May 2008, 10:26,
archived)
[large corporation] lassoes nearly 5000 customers in first quarter
suggested new phrase:
[large corporation] loses nearly 5000 customers in first quarter
which I would say is a fairly major error of comprehension
*massages bridge of nose*
Have you got anything to hit her in the face with? Light plastic chair?
( ,
Tue 27 May 2008, 10:28,
archived)
fuck that's retarded
still, I suppose it's exactly retarded in that it's precisely the opposite of what was meant
there's some value in that maybe
(straws, clutching)
how much are these twits being paid to fail in the subtle understanding of basic English?
( ,
Tue 27 May 2008, 10:28,
archived)
there's some value in that maybe
(straws, clutching)
how much are these twits being paid to fail in the subtle understanding of basic English?
O_O
then I presume that this job actually requires some level of qualification above nvq 1 in opening envelopes
I read about too many mongs getting paid too much to do their jobs badly and it's usually followed with how other people who do their jobs properly fix the mess
( ,
Tue 27 May 2008, 10:36,
archived)
I read about too many mongs getting paid too much to do their jobs badly and it's usually followed with how other people who do their jobs properly fix the mess
this is why my company makes no money
because it pays idiots totally disproportionate salaries
*includes self in analysis*
( ,
Tue 27 May 2008, 10:39,
archived)
*includes self in analysis*
oh well, she sounds like she's got a great career in management ahead of her
salary will be doubled within 5 years...
( ,
Tue 27 May 2008, 10:43,
archived)
*nods*
*gestures to self sorting out yet another overpaid client's muck up.*
( ,
Tue 27 May 2008, 10:40,
archived)
Oooh yes please.
I might go on a cookie hunt soon. There's bound to be some, first day of the week in an office with about 70% women.
( ,
Tue 27 May 2008, 10:45,
archived)
makes note to save some of the beans/egg/bacon/lorne sausage/tomato mixture
:D
( ,
Tue 27 May 2008, 10:48,
archived)
Well if an opening ever arises
do let me know, I'm good with grammar (well, essentially. I had a bit of a problem with possessive apostrophes due to my stupid primary school)....
I bet you need qualifications though, yes?
( ,
Tue 27 May 2008, 10:42,
archived)
I bet you need qualifications though, yes?
haha - this company is run almost entirely on nepotism
I'm so totally not qualified for my job
( ,
Tue 27 May 2008, 10:45,
archived)
heh
I just worked it out - there's:
me
my sister
my girlfriend
my girlfriend's friend
my sister's friend
my sister's friend's brother
my sister's friend's brother's girlfriend
my sister's friend's ex-boyfriend
my sister's friend's ex-boyfriend's sister
I think that's it
( ,
Tue 27 May 2008, 10:50,
archived)
me
my sister
my girlfriend
my girlfriend's friend
my sister's friend
my sister's friend's brother
my sister's friend's brother's girlfriend
my sister's friend's ex-boyfriend
my sister's friend's ex-boyfriend's sister
I think that's it
Quick, marry me or something.
Don't worry, you don't have to consummate.
( ,
Tue 27 May 2008, 10:47,
archived)