Hahahahahaha
"Sorry! Sorry! You see? I'm doing it again - so sorry!"
( ,
Mon 6 Oct 2008, 13:22,
archived)
also - this is woo (as ever)
also - I'm not surprised that the courts found him not at fault - the ramifications for cops with guns if he was at fault would have been massive.
( ,
Mon 6 Oct 2008, 13:24,
archived)
yes.
Such as, "Don't shoot the wrong people just because they're wearing a backpack."
( ,
Mon 6 Oct 2008, 13:26,
archived)
After you've tracked them for an hour.
And let them get on a packed tube.
( ,
Mon 6 Oct 2008, 13:29,
archived)
Police intelligence said
he looked foreign... I say shoot first just to be sure.
( ,
Mon 6 Oct 2008, 13:34,
archived)
well he was running and he jumped the gate
the coppers said so
oh wait....
( ,
Mon 6 Oct 2008, 13:46,
archived)
oh wait....
i dunno
hikers and ramblers and such are asking for it, especially if the have those ridiculous long walking stick things, i'll forgive trousers tucked into socks as i'm feeling charitable.
( ,
Mon 6 Oct 2008, 13:31,
archived)
My dad has those sticks
But he's 70, one of his knees is plastic, and he doesn't give a toss.
But I know hwat you mean about trousers in socks.
( ,
Mon 6 Oct 2008, 13:38,
archived)
But I know hwat you mean about trousers in socks.
"If you are asking me did we do anything wrong or unreasonable, then I don't think we did."
(except shooting an innocent man in the head)
( ,
Mon 6 Oct 2008, 13:23,
archived)
^^THIS^^
i'm fuckin baffled that it even requires an inquest!
were mistakes made? clearly, they shot an innocent man.
are the officers in question to blame? well, fuck yes, they pulled the trigger on an innocent man that looked nothing like their supposed suspect.
WTF?!?!
( ,
Mon 6 Oct 2008, 13:33,
archived)
were mistakes made? clearly, they shot an innocent man.
are the officers in question to blame? well, fuck yes, they pulled the trigger on an innocent man that looked nothing like their supposed suspect.
WTF?!?!
As she said - it's our own fault.
We shouldn't have allowed ourselves to be bombed.
A schoolyard error on our part, really.
( ,
Mon 6 Oct 2008, 13:37,
archived)
A schoolyard error on our part, really.
fair point eh?
i think it all just boils down to allowing a woman (i mean, come on, a woman?!) to oversee a highly complex firearm situation.
i think it was probably an ex of hers, she was clearly out for revenge.
WOMEN, KNOW YOUR LIMITS!!
( ,
Mon 6 Oct 2008, 13:40,
archived)
i think it was probably an ex of hers, she was clearly out for revenge.
WOMEN, KNOW YOUR LIMITS!!
AAAAAAAAAAAH THE GOAOAOAOAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAT!!!!!!!
RUN FOR YOUR LIVES!!!! HE CARRIES THE POX!!!!!!
THE BARKINGLY ODD THEORIES POX.
( ,
Mon 6 Oct 2008, 14:48,
archived)
THE BARKINGLY ODD THEORIES POX.
it's nothing to do with her being a woman
and everything to do with her being a massive cunt.
( ,
Mon 6 Oct 2008, 13:50,
archived)
i have to agree with the judge last week
the officers who pulled the trigger were acting on massively incorrect information. They didn't know what the actual suspect looked like. They'd been told to target Menezes, and to follow suspected terrorist protocol.
( ,
Mon 6 Oct 2008, 14:29,
archived)
IT'S UNFORTUNATE THAT HE LOOKED LIKE HUSSAIN OSMAN?!?!?!!?!?!???!!?!!?!?!?
( , Mon 6 Oct 2008, 13:31, archived)
( , Mon 6 Oct 2008, 13:31, archived)