that is utterly excellent, and I am gonna click it for it's woo-ness
but what ever happened to optimisation?
(
theoriginalsteve <this space intentionally left blank>,
Wed 22 Oct 2008, 16:19,
archived)
it was removed
in a cost cutting exercise
(
bilbobarneybobs I'll be 14 in b3ta years soon.,
Wed 22 Oct 2008, 16:19,
archived)
is 119k
to much for a still? I can never remember. I know I've been quite close to the annoyance limit with my animated gifs recently.
/apologises
(
Octo I ruin everything.,
Wed 22 Oct 2008, 16:21,
archived)
250k for animated
50k for stills
(
epiphany coming live from sweden,
Wed 22 Oct 2008, 16:23,
archived)
kay -
optimised chocolate goodness coming.
(
Octo I ruin everything.,
Wed 22 Oct 2008, 16:24,
archived)
No leave it, otherwise you are just making us download more data!
In future keep them under 50k
kthnxbai
(
epiphany coming live from sweden,
Wed 22 Oct 2008, 16:25,
archived)
Normally I don't care, it's just there has been so much of it today,
and a strangely large number of spammers, i'm getting very pedantic today :P
faq says 50k for still images, but no one really cares unless it's nearer 100, as far as I can tell
(
theoriginalsteve <this space intentionally left blank>,
Wed 22 Oct 2008, 16:25,
archived)
broadband
and not caring at people with caps!
(
yanmania... last shagged your mum on,
Wed 22 Oct 2008, 16:24,
archived)
If I were at home, I honestly don't care, but at work, they do like to keep tabs on traffic and sites
(fuck knows how i get away with actaully being on here all day then :S)
(
theoriginalsteve <this space intentionally left blank>,
Wed 22 Oct 2008, 16:26,
archived)