That may be the case,but there are plenty of animals out there who can't here, or see, but they can feel things.
(
Redsushi! Whoop! Whoop! Yes, that one!,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 23:03,
archived)
sure but they would have their own criteria for sensory perception
Tom OBedlam I have control of a tank,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 23:08,
archived)
I think that was my pointwe can subjectify 'sound' as being the oscillation of our ear drums - but it's more complex than that. If sound was subjective in this way then it would not exist - sound waves (the oscillation of air molecules) is an ambient part of our environment and the way we recieve this informative is not sound itself - but our interpretation of sound.
Therefore insects and such without ears will recieve this information in a different way to humans - but that does not exclude the fact that sound exists regardless of whether it is being recieved or not in the same way that if you don't own a radio does that mean Radio Waves aren't all about us?
(Therefore insects and such without ears will recieve this information in a different way to humans - but that does not exclude the fact that sound exists regardless of whether it is being recieved or not in the same way that if you don't own a radio does that mean Radio Waves aren't all about us?
maiden is filmed before a live studio audience,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 23:21,
archived)
(
my other username is a porsche , posting shit pictures so you don't have to,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 23:23,
archived)