
It was made in a bandwagonning moment and is rather crap.
Yours at least attempts a pun, mine is merely tuap.
( ,
Wed 31 Dec 2008, 16:54,
archived)
Yours at least attempts a pun, mine is merely tuap.

What do you base this thoroughly left-field opinion on?
It does go against almost all educated histories.
( ,
Wed 31 Dec 2008, 16:57,
archived)
It does go against almost all educated histories.

Until then, he didn't and science over rules every thing
( ,
Wed 31 Dec 2008, 17:04,
archived)

Science and Jesus are not mutually exclusive.
His body is either long gone or, if you are a Christian, in heaven.
( ,
Wed 31 Dec 2008, 17:09,
archived)
His body is either long gone or, if you are a Christian, in heaven.

in the world not only did he exist but there are shit loads of them left alive today.
Further more in an infinite universe the law of probability makes it infinitely improbable
that there aren't an infinite amounts of Jesusi doing everything imaginable somewhere.
Always have been always will be because time is infinite too.
edit : bada fuckin' bing
( ,
Wed 31 Dec 2008, 17:12,
archived)
Further more in an infinite universe the law of probability makes it infinitely improbable
that there aren't an infinite amounts of Jesusi doing everything imaginable somewhere.
Always have been always will be because time is infinite too.
edit : bada fuckin' bing

Jesus existed, but not as the Son of God.
I just think he was an immensely good magician with a group of people obsessed with his tricks.
( ,
Wed 31 Dec 2008, 17:04,
archived)
I just think he was an immensely good magician with a group of people obsessed with his tricks.

An ability we are all born with, but modern convenience has caused this ability to atrophy.
( ,
Wed 31 Dec 2008, 18:55,
archived)

concur that the 'Jesus' myths/legends are based on numerous
characters and events throughout early history.
The liklihood of a single individual being 'Jesus' is very low...
( ,
Wed 31 Dec 2008, 17:05,
archived)
characters and events throughout early history.
The liklihood of a single individual being 'Jesus' is very low...

but please don't try and tell me there's a god who's in control of everything
( ,
Wed 31 Dec 2008, 17:07,
archived)

who each control allot of things but they cant control infinity that would be too time consuming even for supernatural ideologies.
( ,
Wed 31 Dec 2008, 17:14,
archived)

The likelihood that a single Jesus was ALL of those characters is low, but the central Jesus is likely to be one man, with the actions of othors later attributed to him.
( ,
Wed 31 Dec 2008, 17:08,
archived)

( , Wed 31 Dec 2008, 17:00, archived)

Not terribly good, sadly.
I do not care whether one believes that Jesus was God or not, the fact that a man existed who was believed to be powerful at least around 30 years after his death is pretty fucking certain.
I love the way his list of historians exclude any who write about the life of Jesus. That kind of helps a lot with his theories, but they are not really very scientific, but borne from a desire to show that Jesus did not exist.
There is the possibility that Jesus was a name selected for its common touch, after the event, but the man existed - too many people followed his name too soon after his reported death for him to be entirely a myth, regardless of the documented evidence of his life (including his birth).
I do doubt a lot of the scripture (for example, the young boy at the temple) but not that there was a man who was preaching at the time who had his acts recorded and is our modern Christ.
( ,
Wed 31 Dec 2008, 17:07,
archived)
I do not care whether one believes that Jesus was God or not, the fact that a man existed who was believed to be powerful at least around 30 years after his death is pretty fucking certain.
I love the way his list of historians exclude any who write about the life of Jesus. That kind of helps a lot with his theories, but they are not really very scientific, but borne from a desire to show that Jesus did not exist.
There is the possibility that Jesus was a name selected for its common touch, after the event, but the man existed - too many people followed his name too soon after his reported death for him to be entirely a myth, regardless of the documented evidence of his life (including his birth).
I do doubt a lot of the scripture (for example, the young boy at the temple) but not that there was a man who was preaching at the time who had his acts recorded and is our modern Christ.