b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » XXX » Message 9071568 (Thread)

#






Strewth
(, Tue 6 Jan 2009, 21:26, archived)
# hahaha!
If rollovers told the truth!
(, Tue 6 Jan 2009, 21:28, archived)
# phwoar

(, Tue 6 Jan 2009, 21:30, archived)
# Sunny Bono?
(, Tue 6 Jan 2009, 21:33, archived)
# dunno
i oogled for " ugly "
(, Tue 6 Jan 2009, 21:42, archived)
# looks like him a bit, probably after he hit that tree when he was skiing
(, Tue 6 Jan 2009, 21:50, archived)
# number 3 is a right stunner
(, Tue 6 Jan 2009, 21:43, archived)
# LOL
Hahaha I actually just laughed out loud, and im meant to be asleep because it past my bedtime... :)
(, Tue 6 Jan 2009, 21:51, archived)
# YOU!
BED!
NOW!
(, Tue 6 Jan 2009, 21:54, archived)
# Put that light out!
I can see you, reading b3ta under the covers...

edit: thanks for backing me up, mum.
(, Tue 6 Jan 2009, 21:54, archived)
# top username, there chuck!
(, Tue 6 Jan 2009, 21:59, archived)
# welcome to b3ta
you'll never leave

especially if you flounce
(, Tue 6 Jan 2009, 22:01, archived)
# Stop with your grooming, Micto
(, Tue 6 Jan 2009, 22:05, archived)
# *hides brush*
(, Tue 6 Jan 2009, 22:06, archived)
# Hahaha
Whose had the shortest flounce? (as in feck you all, I'm off, never to return)
Mine lasted 2 weeks and I don't think I'm even close.
I hear there was a 10 minute flounce. Any idea who that was?
Edit: Never mind, I have to go to bed now as your sig has made me all wobbly-eyed.
'night B3ta
(, Tue 6 Jan 2009, 22:08, archived)
# I just had a micro-flounce
between this post and my last, but I'm not sure anyone noticed.
(, Tue 6 Jan 2009, 22:13, archived)
# I think most b3tans have had a flounce at one time or another
usually

1. Some stuff said in anger
2. "You'll never see me again!"
3. flouncee - spams F5 whilst pretending to have quit to see what they are saying about him/her
4.
5. Posts something with a CDC on it
6. PROFIT
(, Tue 6 Jan 2009, 22:26, archived)
# 4. a week of wanking
(, Tue 6 Jan 2009, 22:29, archived)
# Ha ha! Ace!
Reminds me of a misprint in a local paper a while back which concluded

"32, single blue eye"
(, Tue 6 Jan 2009, 22:06, archived)