b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » Credit Crunch TV » Message 9253397

[challenge entry] I'll leave this here.

From the Credit Crunch TV challenge. See all 359 entries (closed)

(, Mon 9 Mar 2009, 21:02, archived)
# Arflol!
(, Mon 9 Mar 2009, 21:03, archived)
# Advance Stig
(, Mon 9 Mar 2009, 21:06, archived)
# Jack B. Nimble
(, Mon 9 Mar 2009, 21:08, archived)
# Makes extra light bread
(, Mon 9 Mar 2009, 21:09, archived)
# That little loafer !
(, Mon 9 Mar 2009, 21:10, archived)
# up up and away in my beautiful my beautiful baboon!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
(, Mon 9 Mar 2009, 21:12, archived)
# Jack B. Quick
Jack rectally impaled on a candlestick.
(, Mon 9 Mar 2009, 21:11, archived)
# How does he get the hot wax off . . .
(, Mon 9 Mar 2009, 21:12, archived)
# TJ for sexy people with 3D glasses:
Can you let me know if this anaglyph works at all? I don't have any 3D specs meself, so can't check this wot I made earlier:
(, Mon 9 Mar 2009, 21:14, archived)
# Well done
It works!

*Courtesy of 'The Big Book of Bugs' 3D glasses.
(, Mon 9 Mar 2009, 21:15, archived)
# Yay! Thanks.
Although with it being from only one source pic, does it look like 4 obviously-separate layers?
(, Mon 9 Mar 2009, 21:21, archived)
# Indeed it does
The second-to-last layer is a bit harder to distinguish as a layer, due to the forces of contrast.
(, Mon 9 Mar 2009, 21:23, archived)
# Oh
So it looks really fuzzy and out of focus?
(, Mon 9 Mar 2009, 21:36, archived)
# The contrast between the fog and the tree line do it for me . . .
(, Mon 9 Mar 2009, 21:15, archived)
# I was wondering the same thing about my pic
(, Mon 9 Mar 2009, 21:16, archived)
# Aye, it works.
(, Mon 9 Mar 2009, 21:16, archived)
# Woo hoo
thanks.

I was at an exhibition in Earl's Court on Thursday and saw my first 3D Tv, no glasses needed.
There is an autodesk plug-in designed for such a TV, it was all really rather impressive.

blurb here..
(, Mon 9 Mar 2009, 21:17, archived)
# Awesome!
That wont make your eyes hurt like a bitch unlike the glasses.

Damn you Spy Kids 3-D!
(, Mon 9 Mar 2009, 21:21, archived)
# Yes she appears closer and the cleavage is deeper !
(, Mon 9 Mar 2009, 21:20, archived)
# blimeh!
(, Mon 9 Mar 2009, 21:28, archived)
# IT WORKS! I CAN SEE A MASSIVE PAIR OF 3D BREASTS!
(, Mon 9 Mar 2009, 21:16, archived)
# Success!
Now I can start brainwashing the sheeple with my subliminal massages!
(, Mon 9 Mar 2009, 21:17, archived)
# I have lost my 3d glasses :(
They made me look like Ronnie Corbett :(
(, Mon 9 Mar 2009, 21:21, archived)
# Some may say that they made him look more like you . . .
(, Mon 9 Mar 2009, 21:22, archived)
# This is possibly true.
Although thankfully I am taller than him. Not by much, but taller!
(, Mon 9 Mar 2009, 21:23, archived)
# The Aquafresh 3d glasses say - Kinda.
though of the techniques the two pics side by sides is by far the best IMO.
like here
(, Mon 9 Mar 2009, 21:24, archived)
# Yeah, I really need to try it with 2 pics and some forward planning now
Spending ages cutting bits out and cloning areas isn't really worth it :( Although I'm interested now in pissing about to try and create some weird effects. Gotta get me some 3D glasses.

To anyone who's done this sort of thing before with only once source - how far apart did you offset the red and cyan bits? I had my layers offest by 5, 10 and 15px from the original image (so the final red and cyan layers were 10, 20 and 30px apart). Really curious if having them closer or further apart would improve things.
(, Mon 9 Mar 2009, 21:33, archived)
# Could you backwards engineer it from
Tahkcalb's anaglyph version of mine?

The picture itself isn't helping you because the bits at different depths don't overlap. Wil is the man to ask. He did a great Alien and someone did the bridge/shark/helicopter very well.
(, Mon 9 Mar 2009, 21:42, archived)
# Oh I see what you mean about 2 pics side-by-side now
I can't do those things, I strain my eyes too much and get a headache :/
(, Mon 9 Mar 2009, 22:01, archived)