see that thing beneath your post that says edit?try clicking on it. and also just get rid of the things that say < img > in your post. and type nsfw blurred out porn that way you'll get a nice happy linkypoohs.
(,
Sun 12 Apr 2009, 12:53,
archived)
I did try.But the internets wasn't having any of it.
(
Guy Incognito was last seen SLAM DUNK'N HOES on,
Sun 12 Apr 2009, 12:55,
archived)
That's no excuse to be an idiot.You posted once and failed. What part of your brains 'was having none of it' in the "Don't do it again" department?
(
Pasanonic 's been known to cause insanity in laboratory mice,
Sun 12 Apr 2009, 13:10,
archived)
Rearrange this: FUCK FOFI could've left it as it was, but I redid it - this is B3TA, and I've seen much worse.
( Guy Incognito was last seen SLAM DUNK'N HOES on,
Sun 12 Apr 2009, 13:12,
archived)
don't get pissy with mejust because you can't work a simple message board and have to keep reposting a poor image when you can't understand what the edit button does.
( Pasanonic 's been known to cause insanity in laboratory mice,
Sun 12 Apr 2009, 13:17,
archived)
ah hah hah hah*clicks so I can keep a tab of this shit*
(
lazygamer VS tittybiscuits,
Sun 12 Apr 2009, 13:18,
archived)
:DI am in a mischievous mood ;)
( Pasanonic 's been known to cause insanity in laboratory mice,
Sun 12 Apr 2009, 13:19,
archived)
Not specifically pissy with you - I dislike all board nazis who think they own B3TA
Guy Incognito was last seen SLAM DUNK'N HOES on,
Sun 12 Apr 2009, 13:18,
archived)
You've just won 'Profile page top trumps'against him so I wouldn't worry.
( lazygamer VS tittybiscuits,
Sun 12 Apr 2009, 13:21,
archived)
I'm not really bothered about b3ta in this instance.I'm just annoyed at your hubris. You are happy to ignore any protocol and your excuse is.....You are a bit fucking thick and can't work things.
B3ta needs a nazi now and then just to educate the half-wits.
(B3ta needs a nazi now and then just to educate the half-wits.
Pasanonic 's been known to cause insanity in laboratory mice,
Sun 12 Apr 2009, 13:21,
archived)
Here's some more B3TA protocol:"Please don't be horrible to other people just because they are new, or you didn't like their picture, or posted something that bothers you. If you can't say anything nice, then don't say anything."
Doesn't apply to you then?
(Doesn't apply to you then?
Guy Incognito was last seen SLAM DUNK'N HOES on,
Sun 12 Apr 2009, 13:27,
archived)
No .It does not apply to anyone.
Ah fuck it. I'm going to troll somewhere else. You are some of the worst fodder I've seen in weeks.
(Ah fuck it. I'm going to troll somewhere else. You are some of the worst fodder I've seen in weeks.
Pasanonic 's been known to cause insanity in laboratory mice,
Sun 12 Apr 2009, 13:30,
archived)
And you wonder why I called you grumpy.Jesus.
(
Quijibo Esq. BSc. May contain traces of nuts,
Sun 12 Apr 2009, 13:54,
archived)
I think someone would be hardpressed to consider this image pornographic
WormuIus,
Sun 12 Apr 2009, 13:00,
archived)
the first one wasn't so blurryand admittedly it was borderline.
(,
Sun 12 Apr 2009, 13:01,
archived)
The original was less pixellatedTherefore people with bad eyesight could make out the details apparently - which is ironic.
( Guy Incognito was last seen SLAM DUNK'N HOES on,
Sun 12 Apr 2009, 13:01,
archived)
Didn't see the originalConsider everything I have written void.
( WormuIus,
Sun 12 Apr 2009, 13:02,
archived)
the original was a coinflip either way as far as im concerned.i think the people that bitch about nsfw should spend more time working than dicking about on the net :)
(,
Sun 12 Apr 2009, 13:07,
archived)
if it looks like pornthen it's not safe. That's the only rule. If one member says that it looks like porn to them then it needs to be linked. end of.
( Pasanonic 's been known to cause insanity in laboratory mice,
Sun 12 Apr 2009, 13:18,
archived)
hear heari find it bizarre that so many are so militant. if anyone works for a company who has a highly sensitive IT department / internet policy, why are they persistently using a high risk internet site at work?
you know, a site that is renowned, neigh exclusively popular due to the edgy, bad taste comedy it provides*
i chose not to listen to certain music that i enjoy at work, for fear that the language and tone of much of it could be mis0interpreted by colleagues. why risk the same with the internet? only have yourself to blame if you get in trouble for using B3ta at work.
*i am aware the site has a mandate to creative work, but come on, most people are here for the tits and wounds, so to speak.
(you know, a site that is renowned, neigh exclusively popular due to the edgy, bad taste comedy it provides*
i chose not to listen to certain music that i enjoy at work, for fear that the language and tone of much of it could be mis0interpreted by colleagues. why risk the same with the internet? only have yourself to blame if you get in trouble for using B3ta at work.
*i am aware the site has a mandate to creative work, but come on, most people are here for the tits and wounds, so to speak.
moke a man, a plan, a canal, panama!,
Sun 12 Apr 2009, 13:19,
archived)
I totally agree thatanyone browsing b3ta at work is a lazy cunt and ought to be fired but it does not alter the fact that there is a strict 'no images that can be mistaken for porn' policy on b3ta and always has been.
( Pasanonic 's been known to cause insanity in laboratory mice,
Sun 12 Apr 2009, 13:23,
archived)
i don't disagreewith the policy, but the zealous application to the point of daily mail conservatism, is more unpleasant than most images that are accused of overstepping the mark.
despite the hand wringing to the contrary, my employer would be as likely to find a page full of dancing magenta cocks as pornographic as pixel tits.
having fallen foul of the pious porn police over an image (that was ultimately decided by the mods (as also stated in the terms) to be safe for work, it rankles.
(despite the hand wringing to the contrary, my employer would be as likely to find a page full of dancing magenta cocks as pornographic as pixel tits.
having fallen foul of the pious porn police over an image (that was ultimately decided by the mods (as also stated in the terms) to be safe for work, it rankles.
moke a man, a plan, a canal, panama!,
Sun 12 Apr 2009, 13:32,
archived)
just don't post naked women or women in bikinisand you are safe with anything less controversial than that. It says so, in the faq. Quite clear.
( Pasanonic 's been known to cause insanity in laboratory mice,
Sun 12 Apr 2009, 13:34,
archived)
in that casewhy do you take a line of 'if one person doesnt like it, then link it'? that isn't the policy.
just for the chew that is.
(just for the chew that is.
moke a man, a plan, a canal, panama!,
Sun 12 Apr 2009, 13:48,
archived)
It's a good shop, the images are pixelated to the extent of incomprehensionThis is SFW in my opinion, however, your employer, forcing you to work on Easter Sunday might be a pixel fetishist.
I don't know.
(I don't know.
WormuIus,
Sun 12 Apr 2009, 13:02,
archived)
Maybe k3b/-\b could use the edit button to change his postso that Johnny-come-latelys like me don't look like cunts.
( WormuIus,
Sun 12 Apr 2009, 13:04,
archived)