
*DELETED*
as,to be honest, the joke probably isn't good enough to defend using the source images.
(unlike the muppets one someone has entered)
( ,
Thu 16 Apr 2009, 22:09,
archived)
as,to be honest, the joke probably isn't good enough to defend using the source images.
(unlike the muppets one someone has entered)

last frame you can still see bits of brain
( ,
Thu 16 Apr 2009, 22:10,
archived)

I usually like your stuff a lot.
But real photos of napalm victims and shootings and stuff - isn't this a bit much?
( ,
Thu 16 Apr 2009, 22:13,
archived)
But real photos of napalm victims and shootings and stuff - isn't this a bit much?

Ron b****y Wordsley!
Harry nevvvvaaaa makes mistakes
( ,
Thu 16 Apr 2009, 23:50,
archived)
Harry nevvvvaaaa makes mistakes

of "disasters" rather limits it to famous pictures of such events.
Erm.. can take it down if it's too much?
( ,
Thu 16 Apr 2009, 22:21,
archived)
Erm.. can take it down if it's too much?

because you can see the faces. A lot of people have died in the photos in the other posts, but you can disconnect from that as there's no-one to look at.
( ,
Thu 16 Apr 2009, 22:24,
archived)

I doubt she'd stop to do some farming under those conditions.
( ,
Thu 16 Apr 2009, 22:28,
archived)

had I not learned (through b3ta in fact) that she survived and went on to live a full and happy life, working to help children, getting married and becoming a Canadian.
( ,
Thu 16 Apr 2009, 22:34,
archived)

being lampooned.
I'm not really having a pop at any of the posts, but I can't see why some are fine and others not. We've got Chernobyl further down and up - many children died in pretty harrowing ways and suffered more than the girl in the photo above. You can't have it all ways.
Actually, you can, but that's beside the point...
( ,
Thu 16 Apr 2009, 22:30,
archived)
I'm not really having a pop at any of the posts, but I can't see why some are fine and others not. We've got Chernobyl further down and up - many children died in pretty harrowing ways and suffered more than the girl in the photo above. You can't have it all ways.
Actually, you can, but that's beside the point...

I see where you're getting at, but where does it end?
( ,
Thu 16 Apr 2009, 22:27,
archived)

I just don't get why some things are a no-no when more disturbing things are fine.
( ,
Thu 16 Apr 2009, 22:31,
archived)

*finds*
*bums*
I love nonconsensual homosexual sardines :D
( ,
Thu 16 Apr 2009, 22:39,
archived)
*bums*
I love nonconsensual homosexual sardines :D

I'd say put an advisory with a link, let people decide for themselves, unless you've really decided you don't like your name being on it.
( ,
Thu 16 Apr 2009, 22:29,
archived)