I don't post anything for you to careI post for the art itself, not the message.
.
(,
Sun 3 May 2009, 14:45,
archived)
.
I don't think we'd mind if it was art.Putting lots of copyrighted imagery into one blurry unprofessional mess is not art.
(,
Sun 3 May 2009, 14:48,
archived)
Putting lots of copyrighted imagery into one blurry unprofessional mess is called the Image Board
Guy Incognito was last seen SLAM DUNK'N HOES on,
Sun 3 May 2009, 14:51,
archived)
the key word is 'blurry'the use of filters, including gaussian blur, is frowned upon.
(,
Sun 3 May 2009, 14:54,
archived)
Not by me!And as resident Lens Flare Ambassador, may I interest you in a ferrero rocher?
/edit: you'd have to use a gaussian blur to get a 'decent' shadow effect, like this though:
(/edit: you'd have to use a gaussian blur to get a 'decent' shadow effect, like this though:
mediocre ha ha ha, you're reading this,
Sun 3 May 2009, 14:55,
archived)
Did you work on the new Star Trek film? Duke Otterby you pre-verts,
Sun 3 May 2009, 14:57,
archived)
Yes, I was one of the stars mediocre ha ha ha, you're reading this,
Sun 3 May 2009, 14:58,
archived)
I only asked, because of all the lens flare in it Duke Otterby you pre-verts,
Sun 3 May 2009, 14:59,
archived)
Heh,I've never seen a star trek film in my life. Not entirely.
( mediocre ha ha ha, you're reading this,
Sun 3 May 2009, 15:29,
archived)
Well, you are spoiling us with thisARGHHH HMY EYES! It's reflecting all over!
also, I really have no problem with filters as long as they are not the main feature
(,
Sun 3 May 2009, 15:05,
archived)
also, I really have no problem with filters as long as they are not the main feature
I'm sure I've used gaussian blur before.Although I use motion blur and the rotational blur more often.
(
my other username is a porsche , posting shit pictures so you don't have to,
Sun 3 May 2009, 14:56,
archived)
Filters are good when used properly.A lot of stuff wouldn't be possible without them.
(
Mu Dinofiddler,
Sun 3 May 2009, 14:57,
archived)
Well the anti-semitism was bad enough...But using Photoshop FILTERS? Burn him alive.
( Guy Incognito was last seen SLAM DUNK'N HOES on,
Sun 3 May 2009, 14:58,
archived)
I wouldn't even class it as a collage Duke Otterby you pre-verts,
Sun 3 May 2009, 14:52,
archived)
then I suggest the following subjects for your artkittens
shark, helicopter, diver and importantly bridge
fluffy animals
rain
unicorns
old video games
in general, try to keep it funny. You know: jokes are better than technique.
kthxbai
(,
Sun 3 May 2009, 14:58,
archived)
shark, helicopter, diver and importantly bridge
fluffy animals
rain
unicorns
old video games
in general, try to keep it funny. You know: jokes are better than technique.
kthxbai
Hey, I am offended that you insult my sense of humorI ONLY post stuff that i think is funny, I don't laugh at every single piece i see on b3ta, but you don't see me complaining that it is not funny do you? If my piece is not funny to you, then move on, i like it.
(,
Sun 3 May 2009, 15:38,
archived)
I said 'keep it funny', not 'funny in the approach'David began creating and releasing an endless barrage of aggressive, and sometimes disturbing, photo-illustration images throughout the internet in an attempt to wake others up about the onslaught of the elite's power hungry world government plan of domination. Sarcastic to the extreme, funny in the approach, most times visually horrifying, this wild new style of illustration screams out our serious world crisis situation in a visual instant.
(,
Sun 3 May 2009, 15:54,
archived)
yesbut not on b3ta, do you really think i care what all these geniuses really believe? If I wanted to have an audience to preach to, would i come here? Hell no, I can find tons of willing chemtrail enthusiasts on the net to talk endlessly in favor of the material. So b3ta is the laughs, and the goofy responses, that is all. If you don't like the art click ignore.
(,
Sun 3 May 2009, 16:02,
archived)
so you admit that you take advantage of ignorant people?www.b3ta.com/board/9416196
Also, your 'I post for the art, not the message' argument, flies out of the window. You are just a dangerous uninformed pathetic prick.
(,
Sun 3 May 2009, 16:13,
archived)
Also, your 'I post for the art, not the message' argument, flies out of the window. You are just a dangerous uninformed pathetic prick.