I thought they almost looked too high but that could be because I have drawn her torso too long.I see what you mean about the way the fabric stretches.
There is only one solution more research.
*googles for busty women in tight T shirts*
(There is only one solution more research.
*googles for busty women in tight T shirts*
Bobby Bob Bob also available on http://jbobw.deviantart.com/,
Sun 9 Aug 2009, 10:32,
archived)
If you want to draw people you should study anatomyactually people say if you want to draw anything you should study anatomy. fuckin' anatomy.
and no, looking at busty ladies doesn't count :(
(and no, looking at busty ladies doesn't count :(
Shada,
Sun 9 Aug 2009, 10:38,
archived)
I had to look at a lot of busty ladies todraw the pictures in my profile :D
(,
Sun 9 Aug 2009, 11:03,
archived)
You are rightI have been avoiding learning how to actually draw people properly for far too long. I should bite the bullet and do it sometime.
( Bobby Bob Bob also available on http://jbobw.deviantart.com/,
Sun 9 Aug 2009, 10:43,
archived)
Torso too long?I thought it was merely a case of her head being too small compared to the rest
mediocre ha ha ha, you're reading this,
Sun 9 Aug 2009, 10:39,
archived)
small heads are a massive problem when drawing people, that's why i love digital drawingsyou draw the head larger than you want on a separate layer and scale.
(,
Sun 9 Aug 2009, 10:54,
archived)
The proportions are slightly out but don't seem to bad
but the breasts do look rather wrong :(
Bobby Bob Bob also available on http://jbobw.deviantart.com/,
Sun 9 Aug 2009, 11:03,
archived)
it isn't just proportion, it's stance and weightyou gotta know how gravity and weight affects the whole body, a rigid medical chart can't tell you that
( Shada,
Sun 9 Aug 2009, 11:04,
archived)
TrueWhy does trying to be good at something have to be so hard? :P
( Bobby Bob Bob also available on http://jbobw.deviantart.com/,
Sun 9 Aug 2009, 11:11,
archived)
if it were easy everyone would do it and it'd be nothing specialalso, and I know I'm doing nothing but criticising you here but I like to see people improve, smooth lineart with variable line thickness can add a lot of style. At the moment it looks like you just draw straight into photoshop or gimp with a thin brush at low resolution
( Shada,
Sun 9 Aug 2009, 11:16,
archived)
Don't worry about the criticism I appreciate the adviceThat issue with the line art was actually what I was trying to work on in this picture.
( Bobby Bob Bob also available on http://jbobw.deviantart.com/,
Sun 9 Aug 2009, 11:28,
archived)
YeahYou might want to try using a different program for lines, one designed for lineart, and then transfer it to photoshop/gimp for colouring.
Or play with the brush settings and find some custom brushes, maybe.
(Or play with the brush settings and find some custom brushes, maybe.
Shada,
Sun 9 Aug 2009, 11:33,
archived)
I've always used GIMP as I am familiar with it and it doesn't cost any money.I have a copy of Corel Painter Essentials 3 that I never installed is that any good?
( Bobby Bob Bob also available on http://jbobw.deviantart.com/,
Sun 9 Aug 2009, 11:39,
archived)
No idea, never tried itI don't know much about gimp either, but I imagine it has the same brush settings as photoshop. I hate photoshop brushes, they're no fun :(
( Shada,
Sun 9 Aug 2009, 11:41,
archived)
I'll give it go but I'm not convinced a new program is going to improve my drawing ability :) Bobby Bob Bob also available on http://jbobw.deviantart.com/,
Sun 9 Aug 2009, 11:56,
archived)
Yes.But I'm biased. I work in Corel Painter, and rarely in photoshop.
I think the main difference with Essentials is it's missing the majority of the brush library of Painter. But so long as it's got Detail Oils you'll be fine (well, 's what I use for lines anyway. You may prefer felt tips or summat).
(I think the main difference with Essentials is it's missing the majority of the brush library of Painter. But so long as it's got Detail Oils you'll be fine (well, 's what I use for lines anyway. You may prefer felt tips or summat).
Troo Troo Barney McGrew,
Sun 9 Aug 2009, 11:44,
archived)
You could try Artrage starter .....it's free(
CanonCaliber A big bore,
Sun 9 Aug 2009, 12:22,
archived)
it's not bad, the tits are huge though.i'm not sure why people worry about proportion so much in cartoony style sketches.
(,
Sun 9 Aug 2009, 11:12,
archived)
It's more that they look sorta stuck onrather than the size. Knockers that big would have more of a sense of perspective.
(,
Sun 9 Aug 2009, 11:14,
archived)
It's how it isin cartoons they base their proportions on real anatomical proportion and then scale it, carefully, so it looks like it COULD physically exist. If you get it just slightly wrong it sticks the fuck out, you just notice it as being wrong and it makes the picture less appealing.
You can't look at your own pictures and see it, though, for some reason, which is pretty annoying.
(You can't look at your own pictures and see it, though, for some reason, which is pretty annoying.
Shada,
Sun 9 Aug 2009, 11:18,
archived)
yeah that pic doesn't look too bad for mine, maybe blinded by the tits.:)
(,
Sun 9 Aug 2009, 11:27,
archived)
the power of tits compels you! Bobby Bob Bob also available on http://jbobw.deviantart.com/,
Sun 9 Aug 2009, 11:31,
archived)
Tell that to JollyJack ;)
Redsushi! Whoop! Whoop! Yes, that one!,
Sun 9 Aug 2009, 11:46,
archived)
he knows anatomyhe just likes that old comic book way of drawing women where their tits are bigger than their heads and their waists are smaller than their thighs.
also he likes his women to be 50ft tall and a squirrel
(also he likes his women to be 50ft tall and a squirrel
Shada,
Sun 9 Aug 2009, 11:50,
archived)
He may well know human anatomy,but his squirrels are more certainly not anatomically correct! And I am accepting no arguments about that at all!
( Redsushi! Whoop! Whoop! Yes, that one!,
Sun 9 Aug 2009, 12:14,
archived)