
( , Sun 9 Aug 2009, 10:13, archived)

I'm happy to receive artistic criticism do you think I have draw her breasts wrong?
( ,
Sun 9 Aug 2009, 10:21,
archived)

And you might want to consider how the fabric of her shirt stretches over them. It's skintight underneath them, but looser at the top.
( ,
Sun 9 Aug 2009, 10:25,
archived)

I see what you mean about the way the fabric stretches.
There is only one solution more research.
*googles for busty women in tight T shirts*
( ,
Sun 9 Aug 2009, 10:32,
archived)
There is only one solution more research.
*googles for busty women in tight T shirts*

actually people say if you want to draw anything you should study anatomy. fuckin' anatomy.
and no, looking at busty ladies doesn't count :(
( ,
Sun 9 Aug 2009, 10:38,
archived)
and no, looking at busty ladies doesn't count :(

draw the pictures in my profile :D
( ,
Sun 9 Aug 2009, 11:03,
archived)

I have been avoiding learning how to actually draw people properly for far too long. I should bite the bullet and do it sometime.
( ,
Sun 9 Aug 2009, 10:43,
archived)

I thought it was merely a case of her head being too small compared to the rest

you draw the head larger than you want on a separate layer and scale.
( ,
Sun 9 Aug 2009, 10:54,
archived)

you gotta know how gravity and weight affects the whole body, a rigid medical chart can't tell you that
( ,
Sun 9 Aug 2009, 11:04,
archived)

Why does trying to be good at something have to be so hard? :P
( ,
Sun 9 Aug 2009, 11:11,
archived)

also, and I know I'm doing nothing but criticising you here but I like to see people improve, smooth lineart with variable line thickness can add a lot of style. At the moment it looks like you just draw straight into photoshop or gimp with a thin brush at low resolution
( ,
Sun 9 Aug 2009, 11:16,
archived)

You might want to try using a different program for lines, one designed for lineart, and then transfer it to photoshop/gimp for colouring.
Or play with the brush settings and find some custom brushes, maybe.
( ,
Sun 9 Aug 2009, 11:33,
archived)
Or play with the brush settings and find some custom brushes, maybe.

I have a copy of Corel Painter Essentials 3 that I never installed is that any good?
( ,
Sun 9 Aug 2009, 11:39,
archived)

I don't know much about gimp either, but I imagine it has the same brush settings as photoshop. I hate photoshop brushes, they're no fun :(
( ,
Sun 9 Aug 2009, 11:41,
archived)


But I'm biased. I work in Corel Painter, and rarely in photoshop.
I think the main difference with Essentials is it's missing the majority of the brush library of Painter. But so long as it's got Detail Oils you'll be fine (well, 's what I use for lines anyway. You may prefer felt tips or summat).
( ,
Sun 9 Aug 2009, 11:44,
archived)
I think the main difference with Essentials is it's missing the majority of the brush library of Painter. But so long as it's got Detail Oils you'll be fine (well, 's what I use for lines anyway. You may prefer felt tips or summat).

i'm not sure why people worry about proportion so much in cartoony style sketches.
( ,
Sun 9 Aug 2009, 11:12,
archived)

rather than the size. Knockers that big would have more of a sense of perspective.
( ,
Sun 9 Aug 2009, 11:14,
archived)

in cartoons they base their proportions on real anatomical proportion and then scale it, carefully, so it looks like it COULD physically exist. If you get it just slightly wrong it sticks the fuck out, you just notice it as being wrong and it makes the picture less appealing.
You can't look at your own pictures and see it, though, for some reason, which is pretty annoying.
( ,
Sun 9 Aug 2009, 11:18,
archived)
You can't look at your own pictures and see it, though, for some reason, which is pretty annoying.

:)
( ,
Sun 9 Aug 2009, 11:27,
archived)

he just likes that old comic book way of drawing women where their tits are bigger than their heads and their waists are smaller than their thighs.
also he likes his women to be 50ft tall and a squirrel
( ,
Sun 9 Aug 2009, 11:50,
archived)
also he likes his women to be 50ft tall and a squirrel

but his squirrels are more certainly not anatomically correct! And I am accepting no arguments about that at all!
( ,
Sun 9 Aug 2009, 12:14,
archived)