b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » Inappropriate TV Product Placement » Message 9698726 (Thread)

[challenge entry] Repost for compo

From the Inappropriate TV Product Placement challenge. See all 374 entries (closed)

(, Thu 17 Sep 2009, 15:30, archived)
# Bit tenuous, sorry.
(, Thu 17 Sep 2009, 15:30, archived)
# That poor man.
years of pain and you make him sell that shite.
(, Thu 17 Sep 2009, 15:32, archived)
# Once again
which programme/film is this?
(, Thu 17 Sep 2009, 15:32, archived)
# The news in the 1980s
Duh
(, Thu 17 Sep 2009, 15:32, archived)
# so films are ok then?
when the hell did this happen?
why am I always the last to know about these things?
(, Thu 17 Sep 2009, 15:33, archived)
# I think there may have been a film entry with inappropriate sponsorship before a TV one with product placement...
(, Thu 17 Sep 2009, 15:36, archived)
# I think there was too...
(, Thu 17 Sep 2009, 15:36, archived)
# Sorry Daveduke, let me russle one up for you.
(, Thu 17 Sep 2009, 15:33, archived)
[challenge entry] Here you go, I've tried to follow your shining example
(, Thu 17 Sep 2009, 15:36, archived)
# You forgot to compo it
(, Thu 17 Sep 2009, 15:38, archived)
# Now do three more in the next fifteen minutes
(, Thu 17 Sep 2009, 15:38, archived)
# This davidduke has to be a troll.
(, Thu 17 Sep 2009, 15:44, archived)
# This is front page material
(, Thu 17 Sep 2009, 15:38, archived)
# WINNAR!
(, Thu 17 Sep 2009, 15:41, archived)
# "Weeeeeellllll.... If it isn't Lonestarr, and is side-kick, Puke!"
:D
(, Thu 17 Sep 2009, 15:37, archived)