I've heard people say that it is quite good actually(or at least not as awful as they might have expected)
(
The magic of chutney Shakes it like an Instagram filter!,
Mon 2 Nov 2009, 15:29,
archived)
yeah me to...although I'm not sure when I'll ever be able to afford to build a PC that will run it.
(
Asnivor needs more bandwidth for his profile,
Mon 2 Nov 2009, 15:30,
archived)
It's running brilliantly on my samsung netbook.I upgraded the RAM to 2gb but it's still only got a rubbish Atom CPU.
People have even got 7 to run on Pentium 3s.
(People have even got 7 to run on Pentium 3s.
2 Can Chunder Word to your mums, I came to prod bums,
Mon 2 Nov 2009, 15:56,
archived)
Yeah much much better than vista was......but then again being anally raped by the cast of "Avenue Q" while singing the hits of Barbra Streisand was quite enjoyable compared to vista. And no, this isn't just a "pick on Vista because it's cool to do so", I did genuinely dislike it.
(
keo COCKS COCKS COCKS,
Mon 2 Nov 2009, 15:34,
archived)
I don't understand why an operating system would require 2 GB of RAMor even 1 GB of RAM, or half that. What's it doing with it all, filling it with DLLs? Or is that mostly free memory, in which case, why make it a minimum requirement?
(,
Mon 2 Nov 2009, 15:40,
archived)
Probably that Aero fancy graphics thingy.....that was slow and shit in Vista but they have improved in Windows 7....apparently
( Asnivor needs more bandwidth for his profile,
Mon 2 Nov 2009, 15:43,
archived)
It probably doesn't need thatbut if they say that, there's an awful lot of people who will go and buy new PCs
(
Joe Scaramanga with a G-double-O-D vibration,
Mon 2 Nov 2009, 15:43,
archived)