b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » XXX » Message 9796046 (Thread)

# I like the stuff Ninj does, some of it is 'par excellence' :)
but 99% of users will flame a newbie within an inch of their lives
if they dare post a couple of images close together or in a short space of time. It's 'frowned' upon by the general consensus here.
It's not as if posting other new pictures in existing threads, or several new pictures in one thread won't attract the same amount of replies/clicks,
and it would also help to slow the board down a bit and give other, maybe newer, users a chance to shine on the board and stay on the main page a bit longer
/just a humble opinion, and nothing personal to anyone
(, Mon 16 Nov 2009, 12:53, archived)
# you getting all that out ahead of no flaming day?
;)
(, Mon 16 Nov 2009, 12:55, archived)
# oh, it's not a flame by any means :)
but start as I mean to go on, and all that ;)
(, Mon 16 Nov 2009, 12:56, archived)
# I sort of agree, but some days ninj and moley are the only ones who keep b3ta going
(, Mon 16 Nov 2009, 12:57, archived)
# no, b3ta keeps going regardless.
As said, I love Ninjs' (and Moleys) work regardless, but it's not a case of 'keeping it going', that argument is redundant.
The board keeps going regardless, but it would be nice if the 'general consensus' worked for regulars as well as new people.
e.g. If a small handful of people are consistently posting, why would a new user, who may have spent a considerable time on something, want to post if within 30-45mins it's pushed right off the board by a series of quickly 'shopped 'fillers'.
(, Mon 16 Nov 2009, 13:01, archived)
# I keep meaning to make a "ninj stock image" fruit machine :)
The same 6 faces, bodies and backgrounds swapping in a random order...

I probably won't, though.
(, Mon 16 Nov 2009, 13:11, archived)
# And so the backlash starts.
REVOLUTION! *stands in a big hall throwing bits of paper about covered in CDCs and knocking over tables*
(, Mon 16 Nov 2009, 13:19, archived)
# totally agree

(, Mon 16 Nov 2009, 13:03, archived)