
The original might be, but it doesn't work like that. A photo image of the original can hold it's OWN copyright. It is a minefield...
( ,
Thu 18 Mar 2010, 23:19,
archived)

Or find an open license one.
( ,
Thu 18 Mar 2010, 23:20,
archived)

make a profit from those images, you will be in trouble. a bit like music, you can listen for free..
( ,
Thu 18 Mar 2010, 23:24,
archived)


£5 million for a painting. We charge £2 for a postcard of it, to try to balance the cost. You take a piccy and sell postcards of it for £1. You are out the price of 20p publishing costs, (as are we). But we are still out £5million. I'm not explaining it well, but that is the gist.
( ,
Thu 18 Mar 2010, 23:33,
archived)

I can understand it for recent art, but van gogh has been dead long over 70 years.
( ,
Thu 18 Mar 2010, 23:37,
archived)

ond therefore the image, changes hands. Like the Beatles songs. They will never be PRS and copyright free.
EDIT: A famous one is 'Happy birthday to you' song. When i was in a band, if we sung it as part of the gig we had to pay.
( ,
Thu 18 Mar 2010, 23:40,
archived)
EDIT: A famous one is 'Happy birthday to you' song. When i was in a band, if we sung it as part of the gig we had to pay.

but it is also complicated, and therefore we hire people to sort it out at a zillion pounds per hour. So they are in no hurry to sort it.
( ,
Thu 18 Mar 2010, 23:44,
archived)

I don't think it's ever been tested in court though.
The US says that copyright only occurs where there has been creativity.
( ,
Thu 18 Mar 2010, 23:46,
archived)
The US says that copyright only occurs where there has been creativity.

which sadly I can't find. But a few years an artist saw a great Sci Fi book cover, and did a painting of it. it was huge, but a total copy. However, it had such a visual impact, that it was displayed and valued at more money than the book had ever made. So who gets the money when the painting was sold?
( ,
Thu 18 Mar 2010, 23:50,
archived)

But they can set whatever rules and restrictions they like for other people taking photos in their gallery, which has little to do with copyright
( ,
Thu 18 Mar 2010, 23:51,
archived)

cameras, for that reason. Also security though, they might be 'casing the joint'*
*Gangster speak that might show my age.
( ,
Thu 18 Mar 2010, 23:54,
archived)
*Gangster speak that might show my age.

but i do run an art gallery. And the hoops we have to jump through for cards etc hardly breaks us even; and that is on paintings we own!
( ,
Thu 18 Mar 2010, 23:23,
archived)