i've wanted an excuse to do this for ages.
there, now everyone can enjoy it.
de ris (little bit nsfw)
From the Make Art More Awesome challenge. See all 735 entries (closed)
( , Sun 21 Mar 2010, 12:25, archived)
there, now everyone can enjoy it.
de ris (little bit nsfw)
From the Make Art More Awesome challenge. See all 735 entries (closed)
( , Sun 21 Mar 2010, 12:25, archived)
Well it's a hobby, isn't it :D
very nicely done
BTW is the one at the back Russel Brand?
( ,
Sun 21 Mar 2010, 12:29,
archived)
BTW is the one at the back Russel Brand?
Back?
Edit: I see you are looking at this from a different correct perspective
( ,
Sun 21 Mar 2010, 12:35,
archived)
Must be tough buying underwear that fits
Edit : Are they going to Banbury Cross?
( ,
Sun 21 Mar 2010, 12:45,
archived)
This must be a first for b3ta?
Making a norty picture into teh fluffs? This should be a future image challenge!
A brilliant idea and very well executed too. I guess I am not alone in finding Beardsley's more adult work very unsettling!
clicketyclick
( ,
Sun 21 Mar 2010, 12:47,
archived)
A brilliant idea and very well executed too. I guess I am not alone in finding Beardsley's more adult work very unsettling!
clicketyclick
i always find it odd when people refer to it as "porn"
as it basically implies you're meant to be able to get off on it.
yeah, i know there is a niche for everything but, still.
also ta :)
( ,
Sun 21 Mar 2010, 12:51,
archived)
yeah, i know there is a niche for everything but, still.
also ta :)
Maybe more in the "Erotic Fantasy" genre?
There was harder "Pron" available to the discerning market back then - even photographic - but I doubt any galleries would have been showing that sort of thing in public.
( ,
Sun 21 Mar 2010, 16:16,
archived)
oh i'm sure
(although these weren't shown in public either, in the early 60's prints were still being confiscated from shops)
i mean now, i'v come across the odd reference to them as "pornographic" works, i think its safe to say the intention is more as funny material than fapping material.
( ,
Sun 21 Mar 2010, 16:35,
archived)
i mean now, i'v come across the odd reference to them as "pornographic" works, i think its safe to say the intention is more as funny material than fapping material.