58/100 = 0.58
34/0.58 = 58.6206896551724137931034483 (confusingly)
100 - 58.6206896551724137931034483 = 41.3793103448275862068965517, so I guess that's the decline as a percentage.
( ,
Fri 9 Apr 2010, 12:57,
archived)
100 - 58.6206896551724137931034483 = 41.3793103448275862068965517, so I guess that's the decline as a percentage.
And I provided my doings.
No wate what's the word ... workings.
( ,
Fri 9 Apr 2010, 13:00,
archived)
Well I'm autistic, I have no idea how I got the answer - I just did.
( ,
Fri 9 Apr 2010, 13:05,
archived)
you're welcome, but I can imagine why you might not have trusted the answer without the doings
( ,
Fri 9 Apr 2010, 13:07,
archived)
no but the question
states 58% and 34% of people - if there are 100 people, 58 of 100 read in 1994 and 34 of 100 in 2008 meaning a drop of 24% - whatever the value is for people is 100%, and the percentage decline relates to this value
( ,
Fri 9 Apr 2010, 13:09,
archived)
wrong
there is a decline of readership of 41.4%
24% less of the population now read a paper
( ,
Fri 9 Apr 2010, 13:14,
archived)
24% less of the population now read a paper
the question doesn't state whether its readership or population
just asks for the decline, so both are right
( ,
Fri 9 Apr 2010, 13:16,
archived)
Mighty Nibus asked for the decline.
And clearly demonstrated the ability to subtract 34 from 58, so I'm pretty sure the answer to his question is 41.4%.
If it's for a presentation, he probably shouldn't say 'it is both 41.4 AND 24 percent'.
( ,
Fri 9 Apr 2010, 13:21,
archived)
If it's for a presentation, he probably shouldn't say 'it is both 41.4 AND 24 percent'.
so because he got 24%
the answer must be 41.4%? Nibus I think he's calling you thick
( ,
Fri 9 Apr 2010, 13:26,
archived)
I can't decide
if you know I'm being silly or if you're getting wound up
( ,
Fri 9 Apr 2010, 13:40,
archived)
I can't decide if you think 32.7 was a serious sugestion :)
edit for clarity: no, I wasn't taking it seriously - I'm glad I correctly assumed that you weren't either.
Nibus clearly lost interest some time ago...
( ,
Fri 9 Apr 2010, 13:41,
archived)
Nibus clearly lost interest some time ago...
Yep, that could be right too
sometimes I see BBC news articles treat a percentage drop in this way and I get confused, but they're an official national institution and hardly ever make lots of typos so it must be a valid way to do it.
( ,
Fri 9 Apr 2010, 13:15,
archived)
the percentage decline is the percentage decline of the percentages.
( ,
Fri 9 Apr 2010, 13:15,
archived)
if Percentage Decline is the name of a mathematical rule
then it should have captials, and not be written in lower case where it could be misinterpreted and generalised
I stopped doing Maths after GCSE, but I have an English degree so I'm now attempting to baffle you mathematicians with linguistics
( ,
Fri 9 Apr 2010, 13:25,
archived)
I stopped doing Maths after GCSE, but I have an English degree so I'm now attempting to baffle you mathematicians with linguistics