*panders*
www.youtube.com/watch?v=gvN_ex95IcE
www.youtube.com/watch?v=OHo32JrkDRk
( , Thu 1 May 2014, 22:09, Reply)
www.youtube.com/watch?v=gvN_ex95IcE
www.youtube.com/watch?v=OHo32JrkDRk
( , Thu 1 May 2014, 22:09, Reply)
(^(^;;^)^) TEAM SPIDERS THANKS THE LOVELY ARTIFUS!
:D
(^(^;;^)^) LOS TEAM SPINNEN!
( , Fri 2 May 2014, 2:30, Reply)
:D
(^(^;;^)^) LOS TEAM SPINNEN!
( , Fri 2 May 2014, 2:30, Reply)
That makes no sense...
The Baphomet, which will stand seven feet tall and be a testament to the glory of the Angel of the Bottomless Pit, would be placed directly beside the sculpture glorifying the laws given to Moses by the Christian God
Why? So the religion is intentionally trying to be the satantic version of Christianity??? Weird. I don't get it.
( , Thu 1 May 2014, 22:17, Reply)
The Baphomet, which will stand seven feet tall and be a testament to the glory of the Angel of the Bottomless Pit, would be placed directly beside the sculpture glorifying the laws given to Moses by the Christian God
Why? So the religion is intentionally trying to be the satantic version of Christianity??? Weird. I don't get it.
( , Thu 1 May 2014, 22:17, Reply)
It is odd that to believe in what is behind this sculpture means that a prerequisite is belief in Christian doctrine, but only that you disagree on which side is best.
( , Thu 1 May 2014, 22:27, Reply)
I just assume Christianity
Claims Christ to be all good and wonderful and Satan the opposite. Surely that's Christ's spin doctors with their properganda?
( , Thu 1 May 2014, 22:29, Reply)
Claims Christ to be all good and wonderful and Satan the opposite. Surely that's Christ's spin doctors with their properganda?
( , Thu 1 May 2014, 22:29, Reply)
I just find it humour us that you have to bbelieve the one to believe the other.
( , Thu 1 May 2014, 22:56, Reply)
( , Thu 1 May 2014, 22:56, Reply)
...or they could pretend to spend $30,000 on a statue of Satan, then only spend $5,000 and donate the other $25,000 to charity
thus pissing off the Jesusfreaks and taking the moral high ground, too.
( , Thu 1 May 2014, 22:39, Reply)
thus pissing off the Jesusfreaks and taking the moral high ground, too.
( , Thu 1 May 2014, 22:39, Reply)
should have tits
as in the original
www.zloduch.sk/baphomet-wallpaper.jpg
/disappointed
I wonder if they will ever get over this image.
( , Thu 1 May 2014, 22:44, Reply)
as in the original
www.zloduch.sk/baphomet-wallpaper.jpg
/disappointed
I wonder if they will ever get over this image.
( , Thu 1 May 2014, 22:44, Reply)
it makes sense to avoid anything
that could be deemed 'outrageous' and prevent it being shown on other grounds.
( , Thu 1 May 2014, 22:49, Reply)
that could be deemed 'outrageous' and prevent it being shown on other grounds.
( , Thu 1 May 2014, 22:49, Reply)
I suppose so.
My initial thought was that they could be not aware at all
of the original only it's nth pop mutation where breasts are
almost always dropped, not manly enough I guess, yet devil was
historically depicted with them, so shame really.
( , Thu 1 May 2014, 22:54, Reply)
My initial thought was that they could be not aware at all
of the original only it's nth pop mutation where breasts are
almost always dropped, not manly enough I guess, yet devil was
historically depicted with them, so shame really.
( , Thu 1 May 2014, 22:54, Reply)