
I suspect he meant 'elusive' rather than 'illusive'.
Cue the appeal based on spelling errors in the sentencing...
( , Fri 2 May 2014, 18:20, Reply)

agreed, that's defo an error. was this guy using voice recognition software? it's near enough another homophone. but i think not. i found reading it a bit of a chore as it was stylistically poor in places, and in the past i've read a lot of dry and formal legalese, but this came across as undergraduate level legalese, not that of a fucking judge.
( , Fri 2 May 2014, 18:30, Reply)

yeah, i could see that being quite likely, and believing that spell and grammar check equates with proofreading.
( , Fri 2 May 2014, 19:14, Reply)

and did you manage to grasp the concept that was trying to be communicated? (regardless of spelling and grammar)
( , Fri 2 May 2014, 19:28, Reply)

oops.
( , Fri 2 May 2014, 19:51, Reply)

HIYA. It was s stylistic decision and when taken I was unaware that it was uneditable.
( , Fri 2 May 2014, 20:03, Reply)

I already countered that other thing. Which was an edit, which I get the feeling irritates you.
( , Fri 2 May 2014, 20:06, Reply)

which can change the perceived context of said reply. seems pretty reasonable to me.
edit: note how i highlight this edit. it signifies to other readers that my original post has been altered. to get personal: it's about honesty and integrity for me. you choose your own path, nay bother.
( , Fri 2 May 2014, 20:14, Reply)

In my defence my reply was simply 'oh'. When I began the edit your reply was not up. I didn't change any meaning, just added something that addressed a point you made that I disagreed with. As for honesty and integrity that's a bit harsh. I deleted a reply once and then copied and pasted it to a comment in the same thread which it was more relevant to. I have never deleted any other comments, and that includes stuff that was epic mental tantrums that made me cringe when I re-read sober.
( , Fri 2 May 2014, 20:33, Reply)

your post edit changed the perceived context (and humorous hilarity) of my reply tho. jus' sayin'
( , Fri 2 May 2014, 20:44, Reply)

( , Fri 2 May 2014, 21:40, Reply)

there is an undeclared edit, right there. initially there was a headline, now there is more. i call hypocrite.
( , Sat 3 May 2014, 0:27, Reply)