
It really does make depressing but also great reading. Judge gets 1,000,000 internet points for section 19. Fucking awesome!
( , Fri 2 May 2014, 16:51, Reply)

what about all the peoples careers he has saved or helped to push under? surely there must be some review of these now that he has been legaly proven to be a liar and a sexfiend
( , Fri 2 May 2014, 17:59, Reply)

not only does he show no remorse but he appears to not understand what the whole fuss is about
( , Fri 2 May 2014, 16:55, Reply)

1) Nonces? Cut their balls off and string 'em up, it's the only language they understand.
2) Bloody Islamics and their 'Sharia Law'. Barbarians. Not like the rule of law we have in Blighty...
( , Fri 2 May 2014, 18:41, Reply)

^exactly this
( , Fri 2 May 2014, 17:15, Reply)

I've met quite a few PR people through work and meeting friend's friends.
They never appear genuine. I could never tell if they were still 'on' and
doing what they do at work.
( , Fri 2 May 2014, 17:00, Reply)

You can't be successful at PR and also be a nice person who considers personal morals when crafting nice public personas for equally horrid capitalists and slave driving corporations. You have to be a cunt. None of the character revelations in the Clifford case surprise me in the slightest.
( , Fri 2 May 2014, 17:11, Reply)

Mendacity sounds like a boring piece of software
( , Fri 2 May 2014, 17:19, Reply)

www.google.co.uk/search?q=mendacity
( , Fri 2 May 2014, 17:53, Reply)

www.private-eye.co.uk/sections.php?section_link=news&issue=1365
( , Fri 2 May 2014, 17:17, Reply)

They are paid to put the point if view of the worst in society and you aren't monstering them.
( , Fri 2 May 2014, 18:17, Reply)

But everyone has the right to a defence, however monstrous. I would argue that (some) lawyers are in effect a necessary evil. I'd rather live in a society without PR workers.
( , Fri 2 May 2014, 18:28, Reply)

I suspect he meant 'elusive' rather than 'illusive'.
Cue the appeal based on spelling errors in the sentencing...
( , Fri 2 May 2014, 18:20, Reply)

agreed, that's defo an error. was this guy using voice recognition software? it's near enough another homophone. but i think not. i found reading it a bit of a chore as it was stylistically poor in places, and in the past i've read a lot of dry and formal legalese, but this came across as undergraduate level legalese, not that of a fucking judge.
( , Fri 2 May 2014, 18:30, Reply)

yeah, i could see that being quite likely, and believing that spell and grammar check equates with proofreading.
( , Fri 2 May 2014, 19:14, Reply)

and did you manage to grasp the concept that was trying to be communicated? (regardless of spelling and grammar)
( , Fri 2 May 2014, 19:28, Reply)

oops.
( , Fri 2 May 2014, 19:51, Reply)

HIYA. It was s stylistic decision and when taken I was unaware that it was uneditable.
( , Fri 2 May 2014, 20:03, Reply)

I already countered that other thing. Which was an edit, which I get the feeling irritates you.
( , Fri 2 May 2014, 20:06, Reply)

which can change the perceived context of said reply. seems pretty reasonable to me.
edit: note how i highlight this edit. it signifies to other readers that my original post has been altered. to get personal: it's about honesty and integrity for me. you choose your own path, nay bother.
( , Fri 2 May 2014, 20:14, Reply)

In my defence my reply was simply 'oh'. When I began the edit your reply was not up. I didn't change any meaning, just added something that addressed a point you made that I disagreed with. As for honesty and integrity that's a bit harsh. I deleted a reply once and then copied and pasted it to a comment in the same thread which it was more relevant to. I have never deleted any other comments, and that includes stuff that was epic mental tantrums that made me cringe when I re-read sober.
( , Fri 2 May 2014, 20:33, Reply)

your post edit changed the perceived context (and humorous hilarity) of my reply tho. jus' sayin'
( , Fri 2 May 2014, 20:44, Reply)

( , Fri 2 May 2014, 21:40, Reply)

there is an undeclared edit, right there. initially there was a headline, now there is more. i call hypocrite.
( , Sat 3 May 2014, 0:27, Reply)

maxclifford.com/
That was quick!
On a side note - I wish all things in the news had such succinct PDF's attached.
( , Fri 2 May 2014, 17:46, Reply)

I wonder if he'll out more lol, the weasely cunt
( , Fri 2 May 2014, 17:53, Reply)

ha!
edit: wow! what money can buy. this doesn't just happen. this was prepared for, planned and somewhat expected. AND MOST DEFINITELY PAID FOR. see also: twitter. i don't do faeces book but would be curious to know what is happening there... let's see just how good a pr man is at managing the media, eh? til he runs out of money, anyway. til then access to the memory hole is no doubt assured.
ps - legal aid reforms
( , Fri 2 May 2014, 18:16, Reply)

www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL44A90BDAADCD1E01
The internet is being EATEN
hehe
Edit, dailymotion, liveleak and allsorts now 'missing' impressive.
( , Fri 2 May 2014, 19:05, Reply)

www.dailymotion.com/video/xycn16_wlm-s02e04-max-clifford_lifestyle
( , Fri 2 May 2014, 19:18, Reply)

( , Fri 2 May 2014, 20:17, Reply)

...for the purpose of having someone 'offed' inside?
( , Fri 2 May 2014, 23:22, Reply)

Born: Kingston upon Thames, Surrey,
Residence: HM Prison Wandsworth
Made me chortle
( , Fri 2 May 2014, 23:49, Reply)