b3ta.com links
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » links » Link 1382355 | Random (Thread)

This is a normal post Could one of you IT types take a stab at quantifying what the saving would probably be?
I understand that there must be some costs associated with maintaining it but what would you be realistically talking?
 (I helped save b3ta! Pig Bodine., Tue 17 May 2016, 9:33, Reply)
This is a normal post Search engine cost, bandwidth, possibly QA to check it isn't broken by upgrades, pennies for storage
Probably far cheaper than the cost of taking it down.
 (I helped save b3ta! Tonsil is slowly atrophying, Tue 17 May 2016, 9:41, Reply)
This is a normal post aye, it doesn't make any sense
Once it's up, it's up. It probably costs more to take it down
 (I helped save b3ta! colmcq2, Tue 17 May 2016, 9:50, Reply)
This is a normal post I think this is less about cost
and more about non-competition
 (yokelrobin THE NERD WHOSE HAIR DEFIES GRAVITY/FASHION, Tue 17 May 2016, 9:49, Reply)
This is a normal post It's an easy option for the BBC
It whips up public fury to help oppose BBC cuts. If they do a U-turn they come out as the good guys who listened to the public, and if they don't they can sell more cookery books.
 (I helped save b3ta! Cactus 1 doesn't care what you think on, Tue 17 May 2016, 10:39, Reply)
This is a normal post Fuck all probs, at least nothing significant.
Like yokel says it's about moving it into 1 commercial entity. Staffing can certainly be decreased saving some dosh. Most likely an attempt to simplify. In fairness it makes sense to only run 1 recipe website rather than split your offering. It may move more hits to the commercial side and provide extra cash as well.
 (I helped save b3ta! Fadgebadger Sweaty sumo wanks for everyone!, Tue 17 May 2016, 9:55, Reply)