Well, I doubt she's had any better offers.
P.S. It's "railway station", not "train station".
(, Wed 8 Nov 2017, 12:08, Reply)
Well, this bus stop was quite keen.
(
Mudface The web isn't callipygian, Wed 8 Nov 2017, 12:14,
Reply)
From that very page
"In British English, traditional usage favours railway station or simply station, even though train station, which is an Americanism, is now misused instead of railway station in writing."
(
evil_andy Stick stick stick stick sticky sticky stick stick, Wed 8 Nov 2017, 13:19,
Reply)
That's clearly not correct though.
I take no issue with the first part of that sentence.
But misused? Is there a more correct usage for "train station" than meaning "station for trains" such that using it as "station for trains" counts as misuse?
That's clearly just someone's opinion, and not an objective fact. So I have corrected it.
(, Wed 8 Nov 2017, 13:50, Reply)
I don't really care either way
I was just amused that the page you produced as proof seemed to directly contradict you.
Edit: and now you've edited that page so that it doesn't? That's genius. I'd take my hat off to you were I the sort of cunt who wore one.
(
evil_andy Stick stick stick stick sticky sticky stick stick, Wed 8 Nov 2017, 13:55,
Reply)
Lol, yeah I suppose it was a bit of a cheap trick,
but I wouldn't edit a page to be actually wrong only to prove a point. I figured I should do it here since the original sentence basically didn't make sense.
(, Wed 8 Nov 2017, 14:04, Reply)
Words get old and replaced. That's why games like Call My Bluff exist.
(
presferatu, Wed 8 Nov 2017, 13:18,
Reply)
Haha. You're a sad cunt.
(
Tab Hunter Make this useless process end and so, begin again, Wed 8 Nov 2017, 13:34,
Reply)