“Excellence full stop”
...when using a mixed sex class = male excellence, because mixing the sexes at the Olympics would result in no female Olympians. Mixing sexes in football would mean zero professional footballers,. Mixing sexes in sprinting would = zero female world record holders. Boxing - no female title holders.
You haven’t even been able to lay out a laypersons vague idea of how this works work in practice, and you’ve done so while admitting not being an expert. Hard to conclude that what you’ve done is seen that a male wants into female sport and been so enthusiastic about it that you, who isn’t an athlete, are happy to write off female sport at a stroke.
And that, my friend, is sexism; it’s sexism that emerges from the left, so it’s sexism that you’ll find your left wing mates approve of. But it’s sexism all the same, and it stinks; you initially said you don’t understand why sport is segregated by a sex binary; that would suggest you had a much more sensible plan in mind. You’ve been unable to demonstrate even the most basic idea of how it would actually work in practice, how to ensure integrity and safety. Maybe just put this one down to “hmmm, I didn’t think it through” because that’s a better option than sticking to your guns here. You’ve heard that it’s the right, good thing to think. It ain’t.
(, Tue 29 Jun 2021, 11:26, Reply)
I don't understand what you're saying in that first bit at all
Why would I need to lay out how this would work in detail. This is b3ta, we're just chewing the fat not actually solving world problems.
You're completely misjudging me with the sexism thing, I'm not saying get rid of women's sports, I'm talking about trying a new separate system based not on gender but on ability. You could keep having male and female divided competition, there's not a finite amount of competitions you can have.
(
HappyToast Groat froth, Tue 29 Jun 2021, 12:00,
Reply)
aspects of your system seems quite contradictory so I can see why he/she might want more detail
(, Tue 29 Jun 2021, 12:22, Reply)
what system? And why would I have more detail?
Hold on, is this b3ta? I haven't accidentally been posting on the World governing body for sports scientists have I?
I simply said "I've never quite understood why there are such binary male and female options in sports" when humans come in all shapes and sizes of varying ability and with so many external factors on top of that. Some sports have weight/ability classes to separate people, can that not be expanded on to solve this issue? I didn't expect some kind of sexism accusing Spanish inquisition
(
HappyToast Groat froth, Tue 29 Jun 2021, 12:29,
Reply)
If you’ve never quite understood why there is a male female distinction in sports
That strongly implies that a more sensible model is something that springs to mind easily.
You’ve made vague suggestions and had potential issues identified, so I’ve asked you for a specific, back of the envelope summary of what your alternative looks like.
If there’s no obvious alternative, then that’s your lay person’s, chewing the fat answer as to why the male/female distinction exists.
The nature of this board doesn’t preclude me from articulating why male and female distinctions are essential, so I don’t see why it should preclude you from informally laying out why you think I’m wrong.
Your initial point about weight/height doesn’t work, because pound for pound men still have advantage; “same weight” isn’t “same physiology”
(, Tue 29 Jun 2021, 12:35, Reply)
I'm not saying anyone is right or wrong
I'm just pondering on whether it might be good or not to try a more scientific approach to sports based on ability which might solve the issue in the original post, especially when so many sports seem biased on physical attributes. I don't think I need to spend any time investigating the complex nuances and writing up details, even on the back of an envelope. Because this is b3ta, it's just chit chat.
(
HappyToast Groat froth, Tue 29 Jun 2021, 12:46,
Reply)
When we base on “ability”
without controlling for the differing physiology of the sexes, “highest achievers” = “male athletes”
Most competitive sports were already designed to recognise attributes society valued in male people.
You’re simultaneously arguing for a more scientific approach while also saying that as it’s chit chat, being asked to scrutinise the implications of your arguments just isn’t cricket.
Here’s an example
Base football on “ability” not sex, and there are zero young girls who watch England vs Germany this evening who will be able to do so while thinking “if I train hard, I can represent my country at international level at football”, because no female footballers will be as good even as the top 1% of male footballers, let alone the even tinier number who represent their countries.
Same applies for sprinting, boxing, weightlifting, tennis, swimming and countless other elite sports.
Simply put, the answer to “why separate sports by sex” is “because if we don’t, there’s no female elite sport”
It seems you don’t really have a counterpoint to this - even your own example of boxing was immediately shown to be wrong, and while you said that’s not what you meant, it’s not clear what you did mean.
(, Tue 29 Jun 2021, 13:04, Reply)
I'm not arguing anything, I'm wondering if there's a better, more inclusive and still fair way of doing it
I'm sure it's been tried, tested and rejected by many minds greater and more focused than mine, but there's also a huge chance that we're stuck in the current system because it profits some people and why bother rocking the boat.
So apologies for half arsed considering it, but that's all I was doing.
Also, you have mixed competition in snooker, equestrian and stuff, so who knows, maybe they'll find a way in other elite sports.
I'm off now, peace and love as Ringo would say.
(
HappyToast Groat froth, Tue 29 Jun 2021, 13:41,
Reply)
Those last sports you mention
are not based on strength, build or stamina where males have an obvious advantage, so I'm not sure your point holds up there
(, Tue 29 Jun 2021, 13:50, Reply)
^this
there is a lot of fuzzy logic being thrown around by some in this thread
(
Mex3 =mememe, Tue 29 Jun 2021, 14:51,
Reply)
Snooker and equestrian sports
Are an example of sports where segregation of sex would be sexism rather than recognition of sex differences.
The fact that we have some sports that aren’t segregated by sex suggests that the question of fairness has been addressed, and resulted in a situation where sports are, funnily enough, segregated by sex where it’s legitimate and fair to do so, and not where it isn’t.
If you’re able to give just *one* example of an elite female athlete whose prowess and recognition is limited by not being allowed to show that she’d outperform elite males in direct competition, I’ll concede that something needs looking at.
As it stands, all you’re saying is “because trans people, maybe “male and female” are outdated terms”
That is frankly nonsense, and it’s dangerous nonsense because if a reasonable, unbiased person read this thread, they’d see that your instinctive desire to support trans rights has resulted in egregious casual sexism
(, Tue 29 Jun 2021, 13:58, Reply)
we have womens sports for the same reason we have the paralympics
most of the time this goes unexamined and unspoken, but occasionally some prick like bobby riggs or McEnroe decides to make a point about it. It's a little ironic that in their desire for inclusion as women in sport, male to female trans athletes are once again bringing back into focus this inconvenient truth, and I think will get confronted by disgruntled female athletes that gender identity choice and gender are not the same thing if the big kiwi trans weightlifter wins gold in tokyo. there's already ructions. I'm not that fussed myself, it's only women's sport, but I can't see how you can please all parties. It's one of those life of brian foetus gestating in a bucket things
(
cumquat may will not be commenting further on the allegations, Tue 29 Jun 2021, 15:58,
Reply)