
there only saying this crap becusae "spriat worlds" and monothestic relgions are such cultraly ecceptable ideas. relgion vs scince is only seen as a valdid debate becasue people have beilved in god for so long. there is as much eveidnce for harry potter as there is for any relgious idea. yet if you suggested to theses guys an exsperment at a train station to see if harry pottor was going to come out the wall they would think you were crasy
( , Thu 18 Sep 2008, 13:39, Reply)

WHY DOESN'T ANYONE HAVE ANYTHING BAD TO SAY ABOUT TRYING TO TURN LEAD INTO GOLD USING DISTILLED PISS?
( , Thu 18 Sep 2008, 13:43, Reply)

it was possible.
Who are we to argue against ancient beliefs? It is not their fault that they hadn't discovered as much as us yet.
And as you say, it lead to modern chemistry ;)
( , Thu 18 Sep 2008, 13:47, Reply)

I pointed out where chemistry came from and you described how it evolved.
( , Thu 18 Sep 2008, 13:51, Reply)

so i dont see how your point is valid
( , Thu 18 Sep 2008, 13:55, Reply)

If some nutter hadn't tried to turn lead into gold using their piss, we wouldn't be where we are today.
But still they shouldn't have bothered, it's all a load of bollocks.
( , Thu 18 Sep 2008, 13:58, Reply)

im saying theres a better method now so yets use that
( , Thu 18 Sep 2008, 14:03, Reply)

So were twisties, they're nice.
Sure, we don't have to go around sucking on cow's tits to see what comes out anymore, but we're naturally inquisitive. That's how we move forward as a species.
Why would you try and discourage this?
( , Thu 18 Sep 2008, 14:21, Reply)

You quite clearly have not read a single word anyone has written.
Either that or you are horrendously arrogant and think that your opinion, and those who agree unerringly with you, is the only one that is worthy and valid, and refuse to accept nayone elses!
( , Thu 18 Sep 2008, 13:44, Reply)

THAT MEANS THEIR OPINION IS INVALID, LIKE GALILEO'S.
( , Thu 18 Sep 2008, 13:47, Reply)

if you think there might be spriat worlds why no middle earth, why not faires down the garden, why not wizards hiding in the malyan jungle. why dont we test all these things based on your veiw on scince we should.
( , Thu 18 Sep 2008, 13:51, Reply)

im saying that if we as a soceity are to accept teh testing of relgious beilfs as a valid use of resorcses why limit to relgious beilfs and not allthings with as much grounding as relgious beilfs, like all the other stuff which is made up
( , Thu 18 Sep 2008, 14:02, Reply)

Some might refuse to admit it, but we can put that down to cognitive dissonance.
Does this mean there is an afterlife? maybe. I don't think that's what the study is trying to prove.
( , Thu 18 Sep 2008, 14:25, Reply)

so to stop being arrogant i ahve to think my opinion is unworthy and invlaid? i you sure you dont think arrgogant because i disaghree with you?
( , Thu 18 Sep 2008, 14:00, Reply)

would suggest im reading what theve written. so i guess im jsut arrgogant for having an opinion that you dont share then
( , Thu 18 Sep 2008, 14:11, Reply)