
You quite clearly have not read a single word anyone has written.
Either that or you are horrendously arrogant and think that your opinion, and those who agree unerringly with you, is the only one that is worthy and valid, and refuse to accept nayone elses!
( , Thu 18 Sep 2008, 13:44, Reply)

THAT MEANS THEIR OPINION IS INVALID, LIKE GALILEO'S.
( , Thu 18 Sep 2008, 13:47, Reply)

if you think there might be spriat worlds why no middle earth, why not faires down the garden, why not wizards hiding in the malyan jungle. why dont we test all these things based on your veiw on scince we should.
( , Thu 18 Sep 2008, 13:51, Reply)

im saying that if we as a soceity are to accept teh testing of relgious beilfs as a valid use of resorcses why limit to relgious beilfs and not allthings with as much grounding as relgious beilfs, like all the other stuff which is made up
( , Thu 18 Sep 2008, 14:02, Reply)

Some might refuse to admit it, but we can put that down to cognitive dissonance.
Does this mean there is an afterlife? maybe. I don't think that's what the study is trying to prove.
( , Thu 18 Sep 2008, 14:25, Reply)

so to stop being arrogant i ahve to think my opinion is unworthy and invlaid? i you sure you dont think arrgogant because i disaghree with you?
( , Thu 18 Sep 2008, 14:00, Reply)

would suggest im reading what theve written. so i guess im jsut arrgogant for having an opinion that you dont share then
( , Thu 18 Sep 2008, 14:11, Reply)