yes im sure your idea of testing thoeries based on random shit will work great
"care to help me test wether my hypothis being an energy wave based on my expriance of light defracting through glass". "no no im far to busy trying to find the invisable faires down the bottom of my garden, it could be true for all we know you cant prove its not!"
(, Thu 18 Sep 2008, 13:46, Share, Reply)
But it isn't random.
Many many people have claimed to have these experiences!
(
Redsushi! Whoop! Whoop! Yes, that one!, Thu 18 Sep 2008, 13:49,
Share,
Reply)
yeah many poeple of lots of diffrent hallucniations many times on a common theme
why pick out the haaluncion about death in order to test
(, Thu 18 Sep 2008, 13:52, Share, Reply)
Because it is easy to test?
(
LordManley twitter.com/LordManley, Thu 18 Sep 2008, 14:45,
Share,
Reply)
If someone has a theory and they want to test it in real life
then that is what we call SCIENCE.
If they get proven wrong, then well done, now we know.
If it can't be proven either way, it isn't science and as such shouldn't be argued about. That would be pointless.
Did you read the article?
"this is a mystery that we can now subject to scientific study"
So if it turns out to be wrong, they get to shut the fuck up.
THIS IS HOW SCIENCE WORKS.
Do you understand what the scientific method is? It's great, you should look into it.
(
gronkpan https://twitter.com/VomitingLarry, Thu 18 Sep 2008, 13:56,
Share,
Reply)
im not questiong wether its a scintific exsperiment
im questionig the basis for the beilf that the theory has a resanble exspectation of being true. its not a scintific theory there are such things as scintific thereis im questiong wehter or not the after life is one
(, Thu 18 Sep 2008, 14:05, Share, Reply)